According to plea, all states except Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal have adopted the three-language formula under the NEP, which is a major education reform aimed at enhancing learning quality for students across the country.
New Delhi, March 6: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court requesting the implementation of the three-language formula suggested under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal.
The petition argues that these states have not adopted the policy, which may negatively impact public interest and infringe on citizens’ rights.
The plea, submitted by BJP-affiliated lawyer GS Mani, states that the refusal or failure of these state governments to implement the National Education Policy or sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) may harm public welfare and violate educational and constitutional rights. The petition seeks a directive from the Supreme Court to enforce the NEP in these states.
The petition asserts, “The State government is under a constitutional or legal obligation to implement the National Educational Policy 2020 of the Central government and to enter into an MOU for the implementation of the said policy, scheme, or project.”
According to Mani, all states except Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal have adopted the three-language formula under the NEP, which is a major education reform aimed at enhancing learning quality for students across the country.
The National Education Policy aims to provide quality education to students from all sections of society.
The petition highlights that
“All Indian languages should be taught free of cost to school children belonging to the poor, scheduled, tribes, backward, and the most backward classes children.”
The PIL alleges that the three states have refused to adopt the three-language policy due to political reasons and wrongly claim that it is an attempt to impose Hindi. The petition argues that Central government policies, including the NEP, apply to all states and that it is their duty to implement them.
ALSO READ: “Don’t Argue in Hindi, Court’s official Language is English”: SC Slams Petitioner
“The Central government’s laws, plans, and policies are applicable to all State governments,” the petition states.
It further emphasizes that “It is the duty of the state government to implement such a policy and this is a fundamental duty and right given in the Constitution.”
The petition also contends that by rejecting the NEP, these states are denying schoolchildren their constitutional right to free education.
“Free education is a fundamental right given by the Constitution. By refusing to accept this plan, the state government is denying the fundamental right of free education to the school children concerned. Therefore, the Supreme Court should intervene in this matter and issue an order to these three state governments to immediately implement the Central government’s National Education Policy,”
the PIL states.
While the Central government supports the NEP as a step towards promoting multilingualism, Tamil Nadu has argued that it places unfair pressure on non-Hindi-speaking states. The Tamil Nadu government has accused the Centre of attempting to introduce Hindi indirectly through the policy.
“The Tamil Nadu government has accused the Central government of trying to push Hindi ‘sideways’ through the NEP, despite the state’s longstanding resistance to such policies.”
The Tamil Nadu government has strongly opposed the NEP, particularly its three-language requirement, claiming that the Centre is trying to “impose“ Hindi on the state.
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE
