The Supreme Court has imposed a strict ban on photography, videography, and creating reels within the High Security Zone. Officials have clarified that the use of mobile phones, cameras, tripods, and selfie sticks is also strictly prohibited.
The Supreme Court of India released a new circular that strictly forbids photography and videography within its High Security Zone, except for official purposes.
This notification, dated September 10, 2025, was issued by Secretary General Shekhar C. Munghate.
According to the guidelines, media personnel are permitted to conduct interviews and live broadcasts only from the designated lawn in the Low Security Zone.
The use of mobile phones, cameras, tripods, selfie sticks, or any equipment for photography, videography, or creating reels is prohibited in the High Security Zone.
The circular clarifies that violations by advocates, litigants, interns, or law clerks could lead to disciplinary actions from the relevant Bar Associations or State Bar Councils. Media personnel found in violation may face a one-month suspension of access to the High Security Zone.
Any breaches by Registry staff will be taken seriously, and disciplinary measures will be pursued for other stakeholders through their respective departments.
The circular also gives security personnel the authority to prevent anyoneadvocates, staff, or visitorsfrom taking photos or videos inside the High Security Zone.
Earlier, On July 26, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) had raised concerns with the Chief Justice of India and the Supreme Court administration regarding the increasing trend of advocates filming video reels and creating promotional content within the Court premises, including the High Security Zones, for social media dissemination.
Calling this practice unethical and potentially hazardous, the SCAORA urged the Court to implement clear guidelines to prohibit such activities.
Their representation, supported by numerous Bar members’ signatures, highlighted the growing trend of videography aimed at social media engagement, which could lead to indirect solicitation a practice banned under the Bar Council of India Rules.
While some videos claimed to be ‘informational,’ the Association noted that they often serve as surrogate advertisements or self-promotional efforts.
The SCAORA emphasized that such behavior undermines the dignity and decorum of the legal profession and erodes public trust in the legal system.
The letter stated,
“This is particularly serious when Advocates-on-Record participate,”
Furthermore, the Association raised concerns about the use of courtroom clips, either from live-streamed hearings or otherwise, in these videos.
They argued that such practices risk misrepresenting judicial proceedings, spreading misinformation, and fostering a culture of sensationalism surrounding the Court’s functions. Judges have previously expressed concerns about the potential for manipulation and erosion of judicial authority due to truncated or decontextualized video clips, especially from live streams.
The letter also pointed to security risks associated with unauthorized filming within the Supreme Court, particularly in High Security Zones, labeling these actions as serious breaches of the established security protocols essential for the Court’s integrity and safety.
The SCAORA has pledged its full cooperation in developing and enforcing appropriate regulatory measures, expressing confidence that prompt action will help preserve the sanctity of the legal profession and uphold the institutional integrity of the Supreme Court.
Read Attachment
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
