The Supreme Court of India urged amicable settlement of a dispute between Coimbatore villagers and the Isha Foundation over a crematorium near its Yoga Center, with CJI Surya Kant appointing Justice Rajendran as mediator.
NEW DELHI: In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has called for an amicable resolution to a conflict involving residents of a village in Coimbatore and the spiritual organization Isha Foundation. The contention arises from the Foundation’s decision to establish a crematorium near its Yoga Center, a development that has sparked concern among local residents.
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, alongside Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi, urged retired Madras High Court judge Justice Rajendran to mediate the ongoing dispute.
The court emphasized the importance of dialogue, stating,
“We request Justice Raveendran to provide his services as a mediator in the case.”
The parties were directed to consult the mediator promptly, with a fee schedule to be established.
CJI Kant noted,
“Isha Foundation is doing pious work and the villagers could be given alternative land and compensation.”
ALSO READ: “Sadhguru EXPOSED” or Free Press Misused? Isha Foundation Moves SC Against Nakkheeran
This sentiment reflects a broader understanding of the issues at play, suggesting that solutions could extend beyond merely halting activities at the crematorium.
Factual Background:
The heart of the issue lies in the residents’ complaints regarding the environmental impact of the crematorium. Counsel representing the local populace highlighted that “the stench from the burning bodies was making it difficult for them.”
Previously, the residents had approached the Madras High Court, arguing that the establishment of the crematorium violated the 90-meter rule under the Tamil Nadu Village Panchayats (Provision of Burial and Burning Grounds) Rules, 1999. However, their plea was dismissed, prompting them to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the local residents, elaborated on the community’s preferences, stating, “The community that stays there… do not burn but bury bodies.”
He further criticized the Foundation’s approach, suggesting that they were imposing a different cultural practice on local tribals.
Observations of the Supreme Court:
Despite the residents’ strong objections, the Supreme Court’s Bench questioned whether the villagers had the authority to impede the cremation activities spearheaded by the Isha Foundation.
Justice Bagchi remarked,
“This (crematorium) was done to stop the unregulated cremation of bodies.”
The court emphasized that the dispute necessitated a balanced approach to accommodate the interests of both parties.
In a notable exchange, CJI Kant asserted,
“Isha Foundation is not a religious service. They are doing some pious work. It’s a good work also.”
This statement highlights the court’s recognition of the Foundation’s intentions and their community service efforts.
As discussions progressed, the court encouraged both parties to consider a mutually beneficial resolution.
It was recorded that,
“On our suggestion, the parties are agreeable to explore a possibility of an amicable solution.”
The court proposed compensation to enable residents to purchase alternative housing, thereby minimizing disruption to their lives.
With notable advocates like Mukul Rohatgi, K Parameshwar, Balaji Srinivasan, and Advocate K Gowtham Kumar representing the Isha Foundation, the stage is set for pivotal negotiations aimed at reconciling the conflicting interests of the community and the Foundation.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s intervention signifies a constructive approach to a contentious issue, urging mediation as a pathway to resolution.
As both parties explore options for compromise, the outcome will not only impact the residents of the Coimbatore village but may also set a precedent for handling similar disputes in the future.
The importance of balancing community rights with organizational initiatives remains paramount as discussions unfold.
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES