The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Today (Sept 25) will head a 5-judge bench in the Supreme Court of India to preside over a suo motu case concerning controversial remarks made by a Karnataka High Court Judge during court proceedings.The Court on Sept 20 took suo motu cognizance of the video clips containing the controversial comments made by a judge of Karnataka High Court during hearings.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: The Chief Justice of India (CJI) will head a 5-judge bench in the Supreme Court of India to preside over a suo motu case concerning controversial remarks made by a Karnataka High Court Judge during court proceedings.
This high-profile case is listed under SMW(C) No. 9/2024 (PIL-W) and will be heard on September 25, 2024, as part of the daily cause list released by the Supreme Court.
The bench is constituted of some of the most prominent judges in the country, including:
- Hon’ble the Chief Justice
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
The suo motu action refers to the Supreme Court taking up the matter on its own accord, following controversial statements made by a judge of the Karnataka High Court during court proceedings. This move by the apex court signifies the importance and gravity of the issue at hand, as remarks made by judges can have a significant impact on public perception and the judiciary’s credibility. The proceedings for the case are slated to begin at 10:30 AM.
This case will undoubtedly attract significant public and media attention, given its connection to the behavior of a High Court judge. The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the matter suo motu indicates the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining high ethical standards and accountability within its ranks.
With the Chief Justice of India leading the bench, the case promises to be a landmark one in the annals of Indian judicial history.
BACKGROUND
On Friday, September 20, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of video clips that have surfaced online, featuring controversial comments made by Karnataka High Court Judge, Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda, during recent hearings.
The issue was addressed by a five-judge bench, including Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant, and Hrishikesh Roy. The bench assembled this morning and passed an order requesting a report from the Karnataka High Court.
The controversy arose after two video clips of Justice Srishananda were circulated on social media. In one of the videos, the judge referred to a locality in Bangalore as “Pakistan.” In a separate clip, he was heard making objectionable remarks directed at a woman advocate, which triggered widespread concerns over the appropriateness of such comments in a judicial setting.
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, commenting on the matter, stated:
“The attention of the court has been drawn to media reports pertaining to certain comments made by KHC Justice V Srishananda. We have requested the Attorney General and Solicitor General to assist this court, and we request the Karnataka High Court’s Registrar General to submit a report after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court.”
The report, once completed, will be submitted to the Registrar General of the Supreme Court.
The court has scheduled the matter to be taken up again on Wednesday, allowing time for the Karnataka High Court to investigate the issue and submit its findings. This development highlights the Supreme Court’s immediate concern with maintaining the decorum and integrity of judicial proceedings across courts in India.
BACKGROUND
Bengaluru: Karnataka High Court judge, Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda, is facing intense scrutiny after two separate video clips of his courtroom remarks surfaced on social media, both of which have drawn widespread outrage.
In the first video, which went viral earlier, Justice Srishananda referred to a Muslim-dominated sub-locality in West Bengaluru as “Pakistan.” This comment quickly attracted criticism, with many questioning the appropriateness of such a remark, particularly from a sitting judge.
Shortly after this incident, another video of the judge emerged, where he is seen making a gender-insensitive comment during a court session. In the clip, Justice Srishananda reprimands a woman lawyer for responding to a question that had been directed to the counsel for the opposite party. When the woman lawyer interjects, confirming that the person in question was an income tax assessee, the judge responds by questioning her reasons for answering.
“Wait amma,”
-Justice Srishananda says, addressing the woman lawyer who then apologizes for her interruption. The judge continues, stating,
“You know everything of him. If asked tomorrow, you will tell what colour of undergarment he wears,”
-while smiling.
This comment was made in Kannada, and it reportedly elicited smiles from the other counsel present in the courtroom, though the remarks have sparked outrage outside the courtroom.
The videos have provoked a strong response on social media, with many calling for accountability and action against the judge. Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, a prominent voice on gender rights, took to her X (formerly Twitter) account to share the video, demanding that Justice Srishananda be sent for gender sensitization training.
“We call upon the Chief Justice of India to take suo motu action against this judge and send him for gender sensitization training,”
-Jaising posted on X, echoing the growing sentiment that strict action is necessary.
These incidents have amplified public discourse around judicial conduct and gender sensitivity within the legal system. The controversy has also underscored the importance of respectful language and conduct from those in positions of authority, particularly in a courtroom setting, where decorum is essential.
As outrage continues to build, many are awaiting further developments, with calls for the judiciary to take prompt action and address the concerns raised by these remarks.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Controversial Remarks
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on CJI
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
