Attorney General R. Venkataramani Today (Dec 12) urged the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to list the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) plea seeking consolidation of writ petitions filed by e-commerce resellers. The matter, which Venkataramani mentioned before CJI, is expected to be heard on Monday (Dec 16).
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: Attorney General R. Venkataramani urged the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna to list the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) plea for consolidating multiple writ petitions filed by e-commerce resellers.
Mentioning the matter before the CJI Sanjiv Khanna, Venkataramani emphasized the urgency of addressing these petitions.
The Chief Justice responded,
“The matter has already been marked; please verify the list, as it has been addressed.”
The case is expected to be heard on Monday. The CCI has approached the Supreme Court to transfer 24 pending writ petitions from various High Courts across the country.
These petitions, filed by major e-commerce resellers, challenge the antitrust investigations against Amazon and Flipkart for alleged violations of the Competition Act, 2002.
Centralizing Cases for Consistency
The transfer petition, submitted under Article 139A of the Constitution, seeks to centralize these cases to ensure uniformity in legal rulings and expedite the resolution process.
The Supreme Court will consider whether to consolidate the cases within its jurisdiction or transfer them to a single High Court, preferably the Delhi High Court.
Background
The controversy began in 2019 when the Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh filed a complaint alleging anti-competitive practices by Amazon and Flipkart. The allegations included preferential listing, deep discounting, and exclusive arrangements on their platforms.
Following this, the CCI initiated a prima facie investigation and directed its Director General (DG) to probe further.
Despite legal challenges from Amazon and Flipkart, the Supreme Court upheld the CCI’s directive in 2021, allowing the investigations to proceed.
However, procedural complexities, including the bifurcation of investigations into separate cases for the two platforms and their affiliated sellers, caused delays.
Key Legal Questions
The writ petitions raise several critical legal issues:
- Authority of the Director General: Can the DG investigate third parties not initially named as opposite parties in the inquiry?
- Notice and Hearing Requirements: Is prior notice and hearing mandatory before designating an entity as an “opposite party”?
- Compliance with Regulations: Are procedural rules under the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, being adhered to?
Multiple High Courts, including those in Karnataka, Punjab & Haryana, and Telangana, have issued interim stays, effectively halting the CCI’s investigations.
Impact on Stakeholders
Prominent firms such as Cloudtail, Appario, and Vivo are among the petitioners. These cases, stemming from the CCI’s original inquiry, have significant implications for millions of consumers who depend on these e-commerce platforms.
The CCI has argued that delays and inconsistent rulings across jurisdictions could undermine its ability to ensure fair competition and protect consumer welfare.
In its transfer petition, the CCI cited the Supreme Court’s observations in a 2010 case, emphasizing the need for swift adjudication to prevent harm to India’s market economy.
Future Implications
The Supreme Court’s decision on the transfer petition could establish a benchmark for managing multi-jurisdictional disputes in regulatory investigations. Legal experts suggest that the outcome could reshape procedural standards for enforcing competition laws in India’s rapidly evolving digital economy.
For businesses, the ruling may redefine compliance frameworks and competition dynamics on e-commerce platforms. For consumers, it holds the promise of a fairer marketplace.
As the Apex Court prepares to hear the matter, attention will focus on how it balances procedural fairness, regulatory efficiency, and consumer protection.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Amazon & Flipkart
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
