On Tuesday(28th May),ED accuses Delhi CM Kejriwal and AAP of involvement in Excise policy scam, alleging payment for Kejriwal’s luxury hotel stay with crime proceeds. The revelations underscore a nexus between the accused and financial impropriety, implicating high-profile figures in the scandal.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
DELHI: On Tuesday(28th May), The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has presented compelling evidence to the Rouse Avenue Court, revealing grave accusations against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) concerning the Delhi Excise policy scandal. The disclosures made by the agency illuminate a network of corruption and collaboration, implicating prominent individuals in what seems to be a blatant abuse of authority.
During the court proceedings, the ED meticulously outlined its latest findings, exposing a troubling connection between Arvind Kejriwal and an accused individual, Vinod Chauhan, purportedly involved in the illicit activities linked to the scam. It was revealed that Chauhan, allegedly handling the proceeds of crime through hawala operations, facilitated Kejriwal’s stay at a luxurious 7-star hotel, utilizing funds acquired through nefarious means.
The ED presented its case for the cognisance of the chargesheet against Kejriwal and AAP. Advocate Zoheb Hossain, representing the ED, articulated the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the close ties between Kejriwal and Chauhan. He underscored the significance of incriminating messages exchanged between the two, which hinted at discussions concerning meetings with sitting judges and Chauhan’s influence over certain appointments.
“Consider the close relationship, the caliber of individuals arranging meetings. What connection does Chauhan have with sitting judges? He (Kejriwal) is implicated in Chauhan’s appointments. I concur it’s unrelated to the liquor business… It highlights the association between him and Chauhan.”
– Hossain passionately argued, drawing attention to the undeniable nexus between the accused parties.
ALSO READ: Delhi HC Drops Rs 1 lakh Fine On Lawyer for seeking “Media Gag” on Reporting Against Arvind Kejriwal
Furthermore, Hossain revealed that a substantial amount of Rs 1 crore was seized from Chauhan’s residence, further corroborating the ED’s assertions of financial impropriety and illegal transactions.
The allegations levied by the ED paint a troubling picture of corruption and abuse of authority within the highest echelons of power in Delhi. The purported collusion between political figures and individuals implicated in criminal activities raises serious concerns about the integrity of governance and the rule of law.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has made startling allegations regarding the involvement of Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, in what has been dubbed as the Delhi Excise scam. According to the ED, Kejriwal is not just a peripheral figure in the scandal but is deemed as the “kingpin and key conspirator” of the entire affair, implicating other members of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) as well. The allegations have sent shockwaves through the political landscape, raising serious questions about the ethical conduct of AAP and its leaders.
The ED’s chargesheet unveils a complex web of illicit activities, implicating several individuals closely associated with AAP. One such individual is Chanpreet Singh, who is alleged to have facilitated the payment for Kejriwal’s stay at a luxurious 7-star hotel in Goa using proceeds of crime.
Moreover, the ED alleges that Singh was involved in acquiring funds from hawala dealers, which were purportedly utilized during the Goa elections and for various other undisclosed purposes. The agency’s investigation further reveals the exploitation of the Punjab Excise Department as a means to extract bribes for facilitating liquor businesses in Delhi.
Advocate Hossain, representing the ED, highlighted instances where stakeholders who refused to comply with demands were coerced out of business, underscoring the pervasive nature of corruption within the system.
“The common factor is that both Delhi and Punjab are ruled by AAP.”
-remarked the court, drawing attention to the political affiliations of the implicated parties.
This observation raises concerns about the integrity of governance in states governed by AAP and calls for a thorough investigation into the party’s practices and policies.
One crucial aspect of the allegations revolves around Vijay Nair, AAP’s former communications-in-charge, who allegedly claimed to have the ability to influence excise policies in favor of the party in exchange for financial contributions. Despite having no official connection to the excise department, Nair’s purported role in orchestrating favorable provisions underscores the intricate nexus between politics and bureaucracy.
Advocate Hossain elaborated on the legal ramifications of the case, particularly concerning the prosecution of AAP as a political entity for potential money laundering activities. Citing the Representation of the People (RP) Act, Hossain argued that a political party qualifies as an association of individuals, akin to a company, and thus can be held liable under relevant laws governing financial impropriety.
“AAP is indisputably a political entity. According to the RP Act, a political party falls under the category of an association of individuals, similar to a company, which is further supported by the Act’s definition of ‘association of individuals’.”
– emphasized Hossain.
