In a recent development within the Kottayam judiciary, Judicial Magistrate Tiara Rose Mary stand against alleged harassment by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Kottayam, Viveeja Sethumohan. Citing continuous personal and professional harassment, Magistrate Mary has officially lodged a complaint and proceeded on leave, sparking a notable controversy within the legal community.
Background of the Dispute
The conflict between the two judicial officers reportedly began in August 2023, leading to a deteriorating work environment. Magistrate Mary, who presides over the First Class-II court in Kottayam, has detailed her grievances in a 15-page letter to the committee responsible for judicial officers’ grievances. The allegations against CJM Sethumohan include public criticism, biased distribution of additional responsibilities, and discriminatory treatment, particularly concerning Magistrate Mary’s pregnancy.
Magistrate Mary’s complaint highlights the severe emotional distress and health concerns she has faced due to the alleged harassment, emphasizing the adverse effects on her pregnancy. The undue pressure and unreasonable demands have reportedly led to a toxic work environment, prompting her decision to take extended leave from her duties.
Judicial Response and Investigation
The issue has reached the higher echelons of the Kerala judiciary, with the High Court acknowledging the receipt of the complaint. The district’s judge-in-charge is set to address the matter, ensuring a thorough investigation. The grievance committee, led by the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court and including other high-ranking legal officials, is expected to take decisive action based on the findings.
As the investigation unfolds, Magistrate Mary has been granted leave until May 10, allowing her time away from the stressful environment. The legal community and public are keenly awaiting the outcome of this case, which underscores the challenges faced by judicial officers and the importance of a supportive and fair workplace.
The resolution of this case could set a significant precedent for how harassment allegations are handled within the judiciary, emphasizing the need for transparency, fairness, and respect in the legal profession.
Also Read – Kerala High Court: Catholic Priest Convicted For Rape, Sentence Revised To 20 Years (lawchakra.in)
