At the Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday(22nd August),, the Principal District and Sessions Judge warned advocate Abhijit Anand that any further misbehavior could result in contempt proceedings. Anand, representing the father of deceased UPSC aspirant Nevin Dalvil, faced this stern judicial reprimand.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
DELHI: At the Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday(22nd August), the Principal District and Sessions Judge issued a stern warning to advocate Abhijit Anand, emphasizing that any further misbehavior in court could lead to contempt proceedings. Anand, who is representing the father of deceased UPSC aspirant Nevin Dalvil, found himself at the center of this judicial reprimand.
Judge Anju Bajaj Chandna cautioned Anand, saying –
“She would initiate contempt of court proceedings if he misbehaved in court.”
This warning came as a response to Anand’s conduct during the proceedings, which were connected to the tragic drowning of his client’s son in Old Rajender Nagar, Delhi, last month.
The controversy arose when Anand filed an application requesting the court to summon the sanctioned building plans for the basement and third floor of the building where the tragic drowning occurred on July 27. The advocate argued that these documents were of utmost importance to the case, stating that they had a “direct connection” and were “very relevant” to the ongoing proceedings. His application sought not only the building plans but also details about the drainage system and the lease deed of the third floor, where coaching classes were being conducted.
Despite the perceived importance of these documents, Judge Chandna decided to assign the application to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) for a hearing, as similar matters were being addressed in that court. Anand, however, resisted this reassignment, insisting that the District Judge herself hear his application.
Anand’s insistence led to a tense exchange in the courtroom. He argued-
“It is my right to be heard. I wish to make my submissions.”
In response, Judge Chandna reaffirmed her decision, instructing Anand to take his case to the ACJM where related matters were already under consideration.
ALSO READ: [Delhi Coaching Centre Deaths] Rau’s IAS Study Circle Premises Access| Court to Decide on August 28
She firmly stated-
“I have noted your case; you may proceed.”
Undeterred, Anand persisted, repeatedly urging the judge to dismiss his application if she was unwilling to hear it herself.
“Please dismiss my application.”
-he said, showing his determination to have the matter heard by the District Judge.
At this point, Judge Chandna issued a strong warning to Anand, underscoring the seriousness of his behavior in the courtroom.
“Don’t even think about misbehaving in my court. My staff has reported that you have been misbehaving with them since this morning.”
-she cautioned.
The case at the center of this legal dispute involves the unfortunate deaths of three UPSC aspirants who drowned in the basement of Rau’s IAS Study Circle, a coaching center located in Delhi’s Old Rajinder Nagar, on July 27. The deceased were identified as Shreya Yadav, 25, from Uttar Pradesh, Tanya Soni, 25, from Telangana, and Nevin Dalvil, 24, from Kerala.
The tragic incident sent shockwaves across the country, prompting widespread outrage and calls for accountability. In response to the public outcry, the Delhi High Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the investigation, ensuring a thorough and impartial probe into the circumstances surrounding the deaths.
As the legal proceedings continue, the court is also set to make a decision on the bail applications of four co-owners of the basement where the drowning occurred. These co-owners have been implicated in the case, and their fate now rests with the judiciary.
Anand, representing J Dalvil Suresh, the father of the deceased Nevin Dalvil, remains steadfast in his efforts to bring all relevant documents before the court.