LawChakra

‘Disturbing Communal Harmony’: BSP Candidate Files Complaint Against Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

A BSP candidate filed a complaint against Himanta Biswa Sarma, alleging that he is “disturbing communal harmony.” The case accuses Sarma of actions that could incite division among communities, sparking concerns over communal tensions. Filed as a legal complaint, this move by the BSP candidate highlights rising political sensitivities and aims to address potential threats to social cohesion.

Medininagar: Kushwaha Shivpujan Mehta, the BSP candidate for the Hussainabad assembly seat in Jharkhand, filed a complaint against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, accusing him of “disturbing communal harmony.”

The case submitted to a court in Palamu district, according to Mehta’s advocate, Sanjay Kumar Akela, who confirmed that it was lodged before the chief judicial magistrate and is set for hearing on November 16.

The complaint follows Sarma’s remarks at an October 23 election rally, where he pledged that if the BJP came to power, Hussainabad would be made a district named after “Lord Ram or Krishna.” Sarma was campaigning in support of BJP candidate Kamlesh Kumar Singh for the November 13 assembly election.

In his complaint, the BSP candidate alleged that Himanta Biswa Sarma, who serves as the BJP’s co-incharge for Jharkhand elections, attempted to disrupt communal harmony in Hussainabad.

Himanta Biswa Sarma, who is also the BJP’s co-incharge for the Jharkhand elections, recently made headlines during a campaign rally in Hussainabad.

During his address, Sarma promised that if the BJP came to power in Jharkhand, Hussainabad would be elevated to district status and named after a Hindu deity. This proposal stirred mixed reactions, with supporters viewing it as a positive step toward honouring Hindu tradition, while critics argue it risks alienating communities and fostering communal division.

Sarma’s statements are part of a broader trend observed in Indian electoral politics, where religious references are often used to appeal to particular voter segments. This strategy, while effective for some candidates, has raised concerns about the impact on social harmony and the secular fabric of the country. Mehta’s complaint reflects these concerns, as he aims to hold political leaders accountable for rhetoric that could potentially disturb the peace in sensitive areas.

With the Hussainabad assembly election just around the corner, this legal development adds a new dimension to the political landscape. Voters in the constituency are likely to keep a close watch on the proceedings, as the outcome could set a precedent for handling communal concerns in electoral contexts.

In the larger context, this case highlights the critical role of responsible discourse in Indian politics, particularly during elections. As campaigning intensifies, the responsibility lies with political leaders to prioritize unity and address pressing issues without creating divisions.















Exit mobile version