Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy with remarks suggesting India should align with majority views, referencing the Uniform Civil Code. His speech included derogatory comments about extremists and raised concerns regarding his impartiality. Criticism arose from legal experts about his commitment to constitutional values and judicial independence.
A BSP candidate, Kushwaha Shivpujan Mehta, filed a legal complaint against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, accusing him of disturbing communal harmony during an election rally. Sarma’s remarks about potentially naming a newly elevated district after Hindu deities sparked concerns over rising communal tensions, emphasizing the need for responsible political discourse.
Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State for Law and Justice, highlighted Lord Krishna’s role as the first mediator during the launch of an Arbitration Centre at the Kerala High Court. He emphasized the importance of small compromises to avoid greater disputes and discussed legislative efforts to enhance arbitration effectiveness. The Centre aims to address judicial backlog and provide cost-efficient dispute resolution.
The Gujarat High Court has temporarily banned the release of the movie ‘Maharaj’ by Yash Raj Films and Netflix, following a petition from the Vaishnavite Pustimargi sect. The petitioners objected to alleged scandalous and defamatory content, fearing incitement of hatred and violence. The court has issued notices to the filmmakers, setting the next hearing for June 18.
In a legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, Hindu representatives reported missing property documents, complicating the case. The Hindu side challenges the Waqf Board’s ownership claim and the alleged compromise. The Muslim side argues the suit is time-barred. The High Court scheduled the next hearing for May 20. The case continues to draw attention.
Today, On 15th May, The Shahi Idgah dispute took on a new dimension as Hindu parties accused the Sunni Waqf Board of fraudulent representation in a 1968 compromise. They contested the ownership of the disputed land and raised questions about the mosque committee’s authority. The case’s outcome could have far-reaching implications for religious site management and communal harmony.
Today, On 7th May, The Allahabad High Court emphasized the impact of the Waqf Board in the Shahi Idgah dispute, addressing property ownership and religious rights. The case presents broader societal debates on religious sites and legal interpretations, shaping discussions on cultural heritage and communal harmony in India. The involvement of the Waqf Board and the court’s ruling add complexity to the matter, creating anticipation for the Supreme Court’s decision.