The Enforcement Directorate(ED) Today (May 30th), opposed Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in a money laundering case linked to the now-scrapped liquor policy and said his health did not stop the AAP chief from doing “strenuous” campaigning for the Lok Sabha polls.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal‘s bail plea in the Delhi Excise Policy case has encountered significant opposition from the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi is currently deliberating on Kejriwal’s request for both interim and regular bail. Kejriwal was arrested by the ED on March 21 in connection with alleged money laundering linked to the now-defunct Delhi Excise Policy.
During the court proceedings, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju, representing the ED, argued against granting bail to Kejriwal. The ASG highlighted that Kejriwal’s health had not prevented him from engaging in vigorous campaigning activities for the Lok Sabha elections.
“There are some submissions to be made. Word used is will surrender. There’s a lot of suppression that has to be brought to notice. He’s campaigning in Punjab. His health did not hinder him from campaigning,”
-said Raju.
He further emphasized,
“Strenuous campaigning has been done. Last-minute bail is being filed and his conduct does not entitle him to any bail.”
The court has directed the ED to file a detailed response to Kejriwal’s bail plea. Kejriwal’s legal team requested that the matter be scheduled for June 1, proposing a morning session for the hearing. However, when the court suggested a 2 pm hearing on the same day, Kejriwal’s counsel mentioned that the Chief Minister had to attend a family engagement.
The court responded,
“We can have it at 2 pm on June 1. I will assume that you have accepted notice if you have sought time to reply.”
Kejriwal’s arrest stemmed from allegations that he, along with other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders, manipulated the Delhi Excise Policy to favor certain liquor traders, leading to significant financial irregularities.
The case, which has attracted considerable public and media attention, was initiated following a complaint by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena.
This latest development underscores the intense scrutiny and legal challenges faced by Kejriwal and his party. The outcome of the bail plea hearing will be crucial not only for Kejriwal’s political career but also for the broader implications it may have on the governance and political landscape in Delhi.
As the case progresses, it remains to be seen how the court will balance the arguments presented by the ED and the defense put forth by Kejriwal’s legal team. The decision will likely set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly those involving high-profile political figures.
The recent court proceedings regarding Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in the Delhi Excise Policy case highlight significant tensions. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposes his bail, citing his active campaigning despite health claims. Kejriwal’s legal team argues for the bail, pointing to his political and personal engagements.
The court has directed the ED to respond in detail, setting the hearing for June 1.
This decision will be pivotal for Kejriwal’s political future and the broader implications for legal standards in political cases.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Arvind Kejriwal
Click Here to Read Previous Reports of Delhi Excise Policy Scam
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
