Kapil Sibal’s leadership of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has been marked by significant controversy, with critics questioning his commitment to the welfare of the Bar. While he has used the platform for self-promotion and advancing his political agenda, his tenure has seen limited progress on key issues affecting the legal community, particularly younger lawyers.
Kapil Sibal’s tenure as the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) attracted significant criticism, with many questioning his contributions to the Bar and the legal profession at large. While Sibal enjoys a prominent public profile as a senior advocate and political figure, his leadership of the SCBA has been marked by a focus on self-promotion, political agenda, and a failure to address the critical concerns of the Bar members, especially the younger generation.
Personal and Political Aggrandizement Over Bar Welfare
One of the most significant criticisms of Sibal’s time as SCBA President is his use of the position to promote his own personal and political interests rather than genuinely serving the Bar. Critics argue that Sibal has misused his platform, turning it into a political pulpit to further his own image and push his political views.
His speeches, often seen as self-congratulatory, rarely focus on the pressing issues affecting the members of the Bar. Instead of using his position to advocate for better working conditions, financial security, and infrastructure for lawyers, he has prioritized political rhetoric and his personal history as a lawyer.
Neglect of Younger Lawyers’ Needs
A major area of concern during Sibal’s presidency is his failure to address the struggles faced by younger lawyers. These emerging professionals are often burdened by financial instability, lack of support, and limited opportunities to advance in their careers. Young lawyers in Delhi, in particular, face numerous challenges, including the uncertainty of stipends, the absence of subsidized housing, and difficulties accessing credit for purchasing homes or vehicles. Despite these pressing needs, Sibal’s leadership has not led to any significant improvements in these areas. His lack of action has left many young lawyers frustrated, feeling unsupported by their professional body.
Furthermore, young lawyers also deal with widespread discrimination from landlords and brokers, particularly when trying to rent homes or office space in Delhi. The SCBA, under Sibal’s leadership, has done little to address or mitigate these concerns. Instead of prioritizing measures to ensure fair treatment and support for young professionals, the leadership appears to have ignored these issues entirely.
Missed Opportunities for Infrastructure Development
Another glaring failure during Sibal’s presidency was his inaction regarding much-needed infrastructure improvements within the Supreme Court complex. One of the most pressing needs identified was the creation of a larger canteen space for lawyers within the Court. Given the crowded and inadequate facilities, a larger canteen was seen as an essential development to improve the working environment for lawyers. However, under Sibal’s watch, the canteen expansion was overlooked, and instead, a museum was constructed—despite the fact that there was already a dedicated space for a museum elsewhere. Sibal’s failure to oppose this move left many members of the Bar disillusioned, as their basic needs were sidelined in favor of a project that did little to address the immediate concerns of legal professionals.
Praising Judges While Failing the Bar
In his public speeches, Sibal has often been seen lecturing the judiciary on their failure to stand up to the government. However, his rhetoric as SCBA President tells a different story. While he frequently praises the judiciary in the media, he has failed to use his platform to raise the legitimate grievances of the Bar.
Read Also: Kapil Sibal will Request To Review of New Criminal Laws if SCBA Agrees
Instead of addressing the concerns of lawyers particularly those related to infrastructure, financial insecurity, and professional growth he has focused on his own political narrative and self-promotion. His speeches have often been a platform for him to wax eloquent about his own history as a lawyer rather than a forum for genuine advocacy for the Bar’s welfare.
In conclusion, Sibal’s leadership of the SCBA has fallen short of expectations. While he may have served as an effective political figure and senior advocate, his presidency of the SCBA has been marked by a lack of concrete action to improve the welfare of the Bar. What is needed now is a leader who is focused on real change, rather than one who is driven by self-interest and political maneuvering.