India’s prisons are severely overcrowded, with 73% of inmates awaiting trial. Supreme Court Justice Augustine George Masih has urged the adoption of technology-enabled house arrest for low-risk offenders to reduce congestion and encourage reformative justice.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: India’s prison system is facing a severe crisis of overcrowding, with undertrial prisoners making up nearly 73.5% of all inmates, according to the Prison Statistics India 2023 report. In response, Supreme Court judge Justice Augustine George Masih has recently advocated for home custody or house arrest for low-risk offenders, using modern technology to ease the burden on jails.
Speaking at a seminar on correctional justice and skill development on Dec 6 in Gurugram, organized by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, He said,
“In India, we can follow the concept of house arrest for low-risk offenders and track their movements utilising technology”.
As of December 31, 2023, India had 1,332 prisons housing 5.3 lakh inmates, of whom 3.84 lakh were undertrial prisoners. Delhi’s prisons are particularly stressed, with an occupancy rate of 200%, far exceeding the recommended capacity. Overcrowding not only strains resources but also hampers rehabilitation and increases the risk of criminalisation among first-time offenders.
Additionally, vulnerable groups like women and children are significantly affected. In 2023, 1,318 women prisoners were living with 1,492 children, with most women being undertrials. Foreign inmate numbers are also rising, increasing by 10.7% from 2022 to 2023.
The Concept of Home Custody in India
Justice Augustine George Masih highlighted that confinement does not always require concrete walls. He suggested GPS-enabled home custody for low-risk offenders to ensure lawful restraint while leveraging technology.
Home custody involves keeping accused individuals within their homes under specific guidelines on movement and conduct. This concept can serve as a practical alternative to prison, reducing congestion and improving the correctional experience for undertrials.
Existing Legal Framework
Currently, house arrest in India is limited under Section 5 of the National Security Act, 1980, primarily for preventive detention. It does not cover most undertrial inmates. Earlier, a 1973 report by the Expert Committee on Legal Aid recommended home custody as a reformative approach to prevent exposure of undertrials to hardened criminals.
ALSO READ: JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Global Practices
Several countries have successfully implemented technology-enabled home custody:
- South Korea: Uses GPS-based ankle monitors for low-risk offenders.
- USA: Courts allow pre-trial detainees conditional release, including restricted movement or fixed locations for educational or employment purposes.
- United Kingdom: ‘Doorstep conditions’ ensure the accused remain at specific addresses with regular police checks.
- France: Judges can impose house arrest with electronic surveillance under Article 137 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.
These examples demonstrate that home custody is not only feasible but also effective in maintaining public safety while reducing prison overcrowding.
Senior advocates and correctional experts in India strongly support the move:
- Pramod Dubey, senior advocate, called home custody a reformative step, emphasizing that low-risk offenders gain little from incarceration while adding to the financial burden of the state.
- Abhijit Shankar, a former empanelled lawyer at Tihar Jail, highlighted that prisons often exacerbate criminal behavior among first-time offenders. He stressed the importance of legal safeguards, privacy protections under Article 21, and phased implementation for technology-enabled home custody.
Benefits of Home Custody
- Reduces Prison Overcrowding: Frees space for high-risk offenders and ensures better prison management.
- Promotes Rehabilitation: Keeps low-risk offenders in a familiar environment, reducing exposure to hardened criminals.
- Protects Families: Minimizes social disruption and maintains family integrity.
- Cost-Efficient: Reduces government expenditure on incarceration.
- Aligns with Global Best Practices: Moves India toward modern, humane correctional reforms.
Challenges and Considerations
While promising, implementing home custody in India requires:
- Strong legal and privacy safeguards
- Robust monitoring systems with minimal intrusiveness
- Public awareness and acceptance
- Proper training for law enforcement and the judiciary
What is House Arrest?
House arrest is a legal arrangement in which an individual is confined to their residence instead of being placed in prison. It is used as an alternative to custody, commonly applied to undertrials, or in certain cases as part of a sentence. While India does not have a single comprehensive law dedicated specifically to house arrest, the provision is exercised under existing legal frameworks and judicial discretion.
Legal Provisions Related to House Arrest in India
- Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973:
Under Section 167, a magistrate can order the custody of an accused person during investigation, which may include house arrest instead of jail. - Bail Provisions (Sections 437 & 439, CrPC):
Courts may impose house arrest as a condition for granting bail to ensure the accused does not abscond or interfere with the investigation. - National Security Act (NSA), 1980 – Section 5:
Allows authorities to detain a person “in such place and under such conditions” as specified by the government, which may include confinement in a specified residence.
Home custody for petty and low-risk offenders offers a forward-thinking solution to India’s prison overcrowding problem. By leveraging technology, India can ensure lawful confinement, protect undertrials from harmful exposure, and promote rehabilitation. If implemented thoughtfully, this reform could position India as a leader in smart, rights-centric correctional justice in the region.
House arrest is a controlled and supervised form of detention aimed at reducing overcrowding in prisons and protecting low-risk offenders from exposure to hardened criminals, while still ensuring accountability and legal compliance.
READ MORE REPORTS ON Justice Augustine George Masih
