A controversy involving the alleged demolition of a Hanuman temple at the Chief Justice’s residence has sparked significant debate. The Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association asserts the temple’s cultural importance and demands an investigation, while the High Court administration denies the claims. The situation raises concerns about the judiciary’s balance between cultural respect and legal obligations.
JABALPUR – A recent controversy has stirred emotions within the legal and public communities. The Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association has raised concerns over the alleged demolition of a Hanuman temple located at the official residence of the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. While the High Court administration has categorically denied these claims, the issue has sparked a significant debate over cultural and religious sensitivity.
Bar Association’s Allegations
The Bar Association, led by President Dhanya Kumar Jain, addressed a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), with copies sent to the President of India, the Prime Minister, and the Law Minister. In this letter, the association alleged that the Hanuman temple, which they claim holds historical and cultural significance, was demolished without proper authorization.
The letter emphasized the association’s readiness to present evidence to support its claims. It stated:
“The removal of the temple has caused immense distress among the legal fraternity. Immediate intervention is needed to maintain harmony and respect for cultural traditions.”
High Court Administration Denies Claims
The High Court administration, however, refuted these allegations. Registrar General Dharminder Singh stated:
“There was no temple in the Chief Justice’s official bungalow when it was occupied, so how could it have been removed? The complaint is absolutely false, frivolous, and motivated. The Public Works Department (PWD) can confirm this.”
This denial has not deterred the Bar Association, which continues to push for an inquiry into the matter.
Cultural and Historical Importance of the Temple
The Hanuman temple in question is said to have been an integral part of the lives of several notable judges who served in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. It holds not just religious significance but also represents the judiciary’s respect for tradition and spirituality.
- Judges Associated with the Temple:
Distinguished judges, including Justice Bobde, Justice Khanwilkar, and Justice Hemant Gupta, who later became Supreme Court judges, reportedly visited this temple regularly for prayers. - Harmony Among Judges:
Former Chief Justices Rifat Alam and Rafiq Ahmed reportedly allowed regular prayers at the temple during their tenures, highlighting their respect for spiritual practices.
Public Asset and Religious Harmony
The bungalow and the temple are government properties. The temple was reportedly renovated using public funds, making it a community asset.
- Significance for Employees:
The temple served as a spiritual space for many employees, particularly those practicing Sanatan Dharma. It allowed them to fulfill their religious obligations close to their workplace. - Concerns Over Demolition:
If the temple was indeed demolished, it raises questions about the lack of proper authorization and disregard for cultural sentiments.
Advocates Demand Action
The controversy has created unrest among the legal community. Advocate Ravindra Nath Tripathi filed a complaint, urging an immediate investigation into the matter. He stated:
“Conduct a high-level inquiry and take appropriate legal action against those responsible.”
The complaint highlights:
- Historical Importance: The temple’s longstanding presence and its association with respected judges.
- Respect for Traditions: The judiciary’s role in maintaining harmony and upholding cultural values.
- Transparency Needed: Clear communication from authorities to address growing concerns among advocates and the public.
Court’s Response to Religious Structures
This issue coincides with a separate case in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. A PIL (Public Interest Litigation) was filed by an advocate, challenging the construction of religious structures within police stations across the state. The PIL argued that such constructions violate Supreme Court orders.
In response, a division bench led by Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait issued notices to the concerned respondents and directed the parties to maintain the status quo.
Impact on the Judiciary’s Reputation
The ongoing controversy has raised concerns about the judiciary’s role in balancing legal and cultural responsibilities. Addressing this issue promptly is crucial to preserving public trust in the judicial system.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association has stressed:
“Transparency and swift action are essential to restore faith in the judiciary and alleviate the discontent among advocates.”
Key Quotes from the Controversy
- “The removal of the temple has caused immense distress among the legal fraternity.” – Bar Association’s Letter
- “There was no temple in the Chief Justice’s official bungalow when it was occupied.” – HC Registrar General
- “Conduct a high-level inquiry and take appropriate legal action against those responsible.” – Advocate Ravindra Nath Tripathi
What Happens Next?
The Bar Association has urged authorities to take the following actions:
- Conduct a Thorough Investigation: Verify the allegations regarding the temple’s removal.
- Provide Transparency: Clearly communicate the findings to the public and the legal community.
- Preserve Religious Harmony: Take measures to respect cultural traditions while adhering to legal guidelines.
Resolving this matter quickly is essential to maintaining the judiciary’s integrity and ensuring respect for cultural values.
Read the Circular here:
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE