LawChakra

From Arrest to Supreme Court Bail Denial: Chronology of the 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case Against Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

A complete chronology of the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, tracing arrests, chargesheets, bail hearings and prolonged incarceration of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, culminating in the Supreme Court’s refusal to grant them bail.

From Arrest to Supreme Court Bail Denial: Chronology of the 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case Against Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam

NEW DELHI: The 2020 Delhi riots “larger conspiracy case” has remained one of the most complex and prolonged criminal proceedings in recent Indian legal history. On January 5, 2026, the Supreme Court of India refused to grant bail to student activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, while allowing bail to several other accused. The ruling once again placed focus on the timeline of events surrounding the riots, arrests, chargesheets, and judicial scrutiny under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Below is a detailed chronology of events tracing the evolution of the case from the outbreak of violence to the Supreme Court’s latest verdict.

Background: Delhi Riots 2020

The riots erupted amid protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the proposed National Register of Citizens (NRC). Violence in Northeast Delhi resulted in 53 deaths and over 700 injuries, triggering a large-scale investigation by the Delhi Police, which alleged a premeditated conspiracy behind the unrest.

Chronology of Events in the Delhi Riots Case

January–February 2020

Arrests and Chargesheets (2020–2023)

Bail Proceedings Before the Trial Court and High Court

2022

October–December 2022

Proceedings Before the Supreme Court (2023–2025)

2023

2024

July–September 2025

Supreme Court Hearings and Verdict

October–December 2025

January 5, 2026

Supreme Court’s Observations

A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale held that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against Khalid and Imam, triggering the statutory bar on bail under UAPA. The Court observed that:

At the same time, the Court reminded the State of its constitutional obligation, noting:

“Article 21 requires the State to justify prolonged pre-trial custody.”

Case Title: Gulfisha Fatima v. State of NCT of Delhi and connected matters

Read Attachment

Click Here to Read More Reports On Delhi riots

FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE

Exit mobile version