Chief Justice Bhansali and Justice Budhwar dismissed the PIL, reinforcing the legality of the FASTag mandate.

Allahabad : The Allahabad High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the mandatory implementation of FASTag for vehicles. The court’s decision reaffirms the legality and necessity of the FASTag system, which aims to streamline toll collection across the country.
READ ALSO: RBI Governor: “Sufficient time given” | On Action Against Paytm Payments Bank
The PIL was filed by a concerned citizen who argued that the mandatory use of FASTag infringes on the rights of individuals who prefer to pay tolls in cash. The petitioner highlighted issues such as inadequate awareness among the public and the lack of FASTag infrastructure in certain areas.
Chief Justice Bhansali and Justice Budhwar dismissed the PIL, reinforcing the legality of the FASTag mandate.
The bench stated,
“The implementation of FASTag is in the larger public interest, facilitating smoother and quicker movement of traffic at toll plazas.”
They emphasized that the system reduces congestion and fuel consumption, thereby contributing to environmental conservation.
The court also addressed the petitioner’s concerns regarding public awareness and infrastructure.
“The government has taken adequate steps to ensure the widespread availability of FASTags and has conducted multiple awareness campaigns to educate the public,”
the bench noted.
The implementation of FASTag is in the larger public interest, facilitating smoother and quicker movement of traffic at toll plazas.”
“The government has taken adequate steps to ensure the widespread availability of FASTags and has conducted multiple awareness campaigns to educate the public.”
The dismissal of this PIL is a significant endorsement of the FASTag system, which has been in operation since December 2019. The court’s decision highlights the importance of modernizing toll collection methods to keep pace with increasing vehicular traffic and technological advancements.
The ruling also sends a clear message about the judiciary’s stance on issues related to public infrastructure and technological integration. By upholding the FASTag mandate, the court has emphasized the need for citizens to adapt to new systems designed for the greater good.