Today(on 13th April), Chief Justice DY Chandrachud discussed the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence in the legal sector, alongside representatives from the Singapore Supreme Court, addressing its impact on court processes and legal accessibility.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!![[DAY-1] AI Integration Raises Ethical Concerns, Facial Recognition Technology Highlighted: CJI Chandrachud](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-180.png?resize=820%2C462&ssl=1)
NEW DELHI: Today(on 13th April), Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud extensively discussed the intricacies and factors involved in incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the legal sector and broader society.
The event, which included representatives from the Singapore Supreme Court, convened a notable gathering of judges, legal scholars, and specialists to examine AI’s influence on various aspects of the legal system, spanning court processes, judicial education, and enhancing legal accessibility.
CJI Chandrachud highlighted how AI technology possesses a two-sided potential: it can revolutionize legal practices and enhance service delivery, but it also carries inherent risks such as bias, discrimination, and ethical dilemmas.
“The complexity of bias’s impact in AI systems poses a significant challenge, especially concerning indirect discrimination… Facial recognition technology (FRT) stands out as a prominent instance of high-risk AI due to its inherently intrusive nature and susceptibility to misuse,”
– he explained.
Emphasizing the inescapable conversation about AI’s role in court adjudication, CJI Chandrachud highlighted the need for a balanced approach.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court and IIT Madras Ink Agreement to Harness AI for Judiciary’s Digital Evolution
“The integration of AI in modern processes including court proceedings raises complex ethical, legal, and practical considerations that demand a thorough examination. The use of AI in court adjudication presents both opportunities and challenges that warrant nuanced deliberation,”
-he stated, pointing out the innovative frontier AI represents in legal proceedings.
Reflecting on the ethical and existential concerns tied to AI, the CJI referenced the Oscar-nominated movie “Ex Machina,” which probes into the implications of creating sentient AI beings.
The film, he noted-
“It offers an insightful exploration of the juncture between humanity and artificial intelligence, initiating important discussions on consciousness, the ethical dimensions of AI development, and the consequences of bringing sentient entities into existence.”
CJI Chandrachud advocated for cautious integration of AI in the legal sphere, ensuring it serves to bolster rather than compromise the pursuit of justice.
“Through embracing collaboration and encouraging international cooperation, we create a structure that advocates for the responsible and ethical utilization of AI technologies worldwide.”
-he said, envisioning a future where AI empowers and uplifts society.
Acknowledging the transformative power of AI, the Chief Justice emphasizes its inevitability in changing professions and enhancing accessibility.
“In the legal domain, this indicates that AI holds promise in expediting and refining the delivery of justice. The time for adhering to outdated practices is over; we must now embrace advancement within our field.”
– he remarked, advocating for leveraging technology to its fullest within judicial institutions.
The discussion also ventured into the practical applications of AI in legal research and case analysis, recognizing AI’s potential to revolutionize these domains. However, CJI Chandrachud did not shy away from addressing the potential pitfalls, including the risk of “hallucinations” in AI-generated content, which could lead to misinterpretations or miscarriages of justice.
ALSO READ: Delhi High Court Judge: Courts Encountering “Complex & Difficult” Time Due To AI
The conference discussed the danger of a divided legal system based on wealth, but also noted how technologies like hybrid-mode hearings can make the Supreme Court more accessible to everyone.
