The Gujarat High Court held that a registered marriage certificate alone cannot validate a Hindu marriage if essential ceremonies under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 were not performed. The Court said registration only proves an already solemnised marriage and cannot create a valid marital bond.
The Gujarat High Court has ruled that the mere existence of a registered marriage certificate cannot establish a valid Hindu marriage if the essential ceremonies required under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 were never performed.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Ilesh J Vora and Justice RT Vachhani observed that registration of a marriage only serves as evidence of a marriage that has already been legally solemnised. It does not independently create the marital relationship when the mandatory Hindu marriage rituals have not been followed.
The Court delivered the ruling while deciding an appeal filed by a man residing in the United Kingdom challenging the decision of a family court that had refused to declare an alleged marriage between the parties as void.
Factual Backgrounds
The dispute arose after the woman approached the man’s parents with a marriage certificate claiming that she was his legally wedded wife. The man, however, denied having ever married her and stated that he had no knowledge of any such marriage.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court: Ceremonies Required for a Valid Hindu Marriage
According to him, no Hindu marriage ceremony had taken place between the parties. He claimed that he had never performed any customary rituals, including the essential ceremonies required under Hindu law, and that the parties had never lived together as husband and wife.
The man further alleged that he had worked in a company owned by the woman’s father and that his signatures were obtained on marriage-related documents by misleading him with promises of professional benefits and threats concerning his employment.
Analysis of the High Court
The High Court examined the legal requirements for a valid Hindu marriage under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The provision states that a Hindu marriage must be solemnised according to the customary rites and ceremonies applicable to either party.
Section 7: Ceremonies for a Hindu marriage
(1) A Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies of either party thereto.
(2) Where such rites and ceremonies include the Saptapadi (that is, the taking of seven steps by the bridegroom and the bride jointly before the sacred fire), the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken.
The Court explained that solemnisation is not a mere formality but an essential legal requirement.
The Bench observed:
“The word ‘solemnized’ used in Section 7 means that the marriage must be performed in the proper manner and with the required ceremonies… In the absence of such solemnization, there is no valid Hindu marriage in the eyes of law.”
The Court further noted that in traditions where Saptapadi is an essential ceremony, the marriage becomes complete only after the couple takes the seventh step around the sacred fire.
During the proceedings, the woman herself admitted in her written statement that no marriage rites or ceremonies had been performed between the parties. She acknowledged that there was no valid solemnisation of marriage and that the parties did not have the relationship of husband and wife.
Despite these admissions, the family court refused to grant relief to the man. It held that since a registered marriage certificate existed, there was a presumption of a valid marriage and the issue required detailed examination during a full trial.
The man then approached the Gujarat High Court challenging the family court’s order.
On “Registration of Marriage” under Section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the High Court disagreed with the family court’s reasoning and held that once the woman herself admitted the absence of essential marriage ceremonies, there was no justification for forcing the parties into prolonged litigation.
The Bench clarified that registration under Section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act only provides a mechanism for recording and proving a marriage that has already been validly solemnised. It cannot create a husband-wife relationship where the basic legal requirements for marriage have not been fulfilled.
While discussing the importance of Hindu marriage ceremonies, the Court referred to the traditional significance of Saptapadi and cited the Rig Veda, which states:
“With seven steps we have become friends (sakha). May I attain friendship with you and may I never be separated from that friendship.”
The Court described Hindu marriage as a samskara (sacrament) and emphasised that it is a solemn institution based on mutual commitment, equality and consent. It observed that marriage cannot be reduced to a mere social event or a contractual arrangement without fulfilling the legal and customary requirements.
The Court remarked that marriage is not simply an occasion for “song and dance” or “wining and dining”, nor is it a commercial transaction. Instead, it represents a lifelong relationship through which two individuals come together to build a family.
After considering the facts and legal position, the Gujarat High Court concluded that the alleged marriage had no legal validity because the mandatory ceremonies under Hindu law were never performed. The Court therefore declared the marriage null and void and allowed the man to approach the appropriate authority for cancellation of the marriage registration and the certificate.
The judgment reinforces that while registration provides documentary proof of a valid marriage, it cannot replace the essential ceremonies required for solemnisation under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Case Title: Kaushal Pramodbhai Sonar v. Khushi Sanjay Shah
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE