The Madras High Court, in a recent ruling, has taken a firm stance against the propagation of divisive ideologies, denying permission for a meeting aimed at eradicating “Dravidian Ideology.” The court underscored that no one holds the right to conduct meetings with the purpose of abolishing any ideology, emphasizing that the coexistence of diverse ideologies is a hallmark of the nation’s identity.
Justice G Jayachandran lamented the inaction of the Tamil Nadu police regarding inflammatory speeches made at a prior conclave focused on the “eradication of Sanatana Dharma.” The justice termed this inaction a “dereliction of duty” and highlighted the responsibility of those in power to refrain from disseminating divisive rhetoric.
“This Court is of the view that, person in power should realize the danger of speech unflaring fissiparous tendency and behave responsibly and restrain themselves from propagating views which will divide people in the name of Ideology, Caste, and Religion,”
the court stated.
The petitioner had sought permission to conduct an indoor meeting to counter a recent “Sanatana Eradication” conclave, citing a fundamental right to such an assembly. However, the court took a contrasting view, remarking that it could not be expected to assist in propagating ideas that foster ill-will among the populace.
Also read- Madhya Pradesh High Court Strengthens Bench With Appointment Of Seven New Judges (lawchakra.in)
The court further noted that granting permission for the petitioner’s request would only exacerbate the disturbance to public peace and tranquility, which has already been strained by certain fringe groups acting in breach of their constitutional oath.
“If the request of the petitioner is acceded, it will cause further disturbance to the peace and tranquility of the public,”
Justice Jayachandran observed.
In its decision, the court suggested that those in positions of influence could better serve the public by focusing on the eradication of social evils such as intoxicating drinks, drugs, corruption, and untouchability, rather than on divisive ideological conflicts.
The ruling has thus set a precedent that the court will not sanction activities that could potentially disrupt societal harmony and contravene the spirit of the Constitution. The petition was dismissed, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in maintaining the secular and pluralistic fabric of Indian society.
Also read- Kerala High Court Takes Strong Stand Against Illegal Firecrackers In Religious Places (lawchakra.in)
