The Punjab and Haryana High Court utilized ChatGPT to evaluate Differential GPS (DGPS) in a property dispute case, emphasizing its precision in demarcation. Justice Gupta endorsed DGPS for its accuracy and efficiency over traditional methods, ultimately dismissing the petitioner’s objections. The ruling showcases the potential of modern technology in enhancing judicial processes and resolving disputes effectively.
Chandigarh: In a groundbreaking approach to integrating modern technology into judicial processes, the Punjab and Haryana High Court sought assistance from artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, to evaluate the efficacy of Differential GPS (DGPS) in resolving a property dispute. Justice Deepak Gupta’s judgment in the case of Kuldeep Kumar Sharma v. Randeep Rana (CR No. 3077 of 2023) underscored the role of DGPS in ensuring accuracy and fairness in property demarcation.
The dispute originated from a decree issued in March 2017, granting specific performance of an agreement to sell a property located in Karnal. The property, comprising a showroom and plot delineated in a site plan, became contentious when the judgment debtor, Kuldeep Kumar Sharma, repeatedly challenged its demarcation despite three surveys conducted over time.
The primary issue was whether DGPS technology, used in the third survey, could provide reliable measurements for legal purposes. The petitioner also sought to examine the Naib Tehsildar and the accompanying Junior Engineer to question the DGPS methodology.
Justice Deepak Gupta consulted ChatGPT to gain insights into the DGPS technology. The AI explained that DGPS provides centimeter-level accuracy by correcting signal errors from satellites in real time. This enables:
- High-precision, real-time location data.
- Resolution of disputes by aligning measurements with cadastral maps and government records.
- Significant savings in time and costs compared to traditional methods.
The court remarked,
“The system of DGPS, with its ability to provide centimeter-level accuracy, must replace outdated methods of property demarcation using manual measurements and fixed points.”
The High Court dismissed the petition, labeling the petitioner’s repeated objections as deliberate attempts to delay the execution of the 2017 decree. Justice Gupta emphasized the reliability of DGPS technology, noting that the property area varied insignificantly across the three reports: 483, 483.23, and 483.10 square yards.
“The era of manual demarcation must yield to modern technology, ensuring precision and efficiency in resolving property disputes,”
the court observed.
The plea to examine the Local Commissioner and Junior Engineer was denied, with the court ruling that their reports adhered to modern standards and were credible. The respondent’s willingness to comply with findings, even based on the maximum measurement, further validated the process.
This judgment highlights the transformative potential of modern technology in judicial proceedings. By leveraging AI and DGPS, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set a precedent for embracing innovation to enhance accuracy and efficiency in legal processes. As Justice Gupta noted,
“Modern technology ensures precision and efficiency, paving the way for fair and swift resolution of disputes.”
Case Title: Kuldeep Kumar Sharma v. Randeep Rana (CR No.3077 of 2023)
Read the Judgement here:
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES