In a recent case that has stirred the conscience of the nation, the Madras High Court expressed its deep disappointment over an incident where a local temple denied entry to a man from the Scheduled Caste (SC) community. The court’s reaction was one of profound regret, stating that such discriminatory acts should make us “hang our heads in shame.”
Justice PT Asha, presiding over the case, voiced her concern over the fact that marginalized communities continue to face such discrimination, even 75 years after India’s independence. She emphasized that such practices are in stark contrast to the principles of equality and freedom of worship enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
The case came to light when M Mathi Murugan, a man from the SC community, filed a petition alleging that he was denied access to the Arulmighu Shri Mangala Nayaki Amman Temple in Pudukkottai district. Murugan pleaded with the court to appoint an Executive Officer to safeguard his right to worship at the temple.
The court was informed that certain individuals, claiming superiority based on their birth into a particular community, were obstructing Murugan and his community members from worshipping at the temple. This was despite a prior agreement reached at a peace committee meeting, which had decided that villagers from the SC community should also have unhindered access to the temple and its festivals.
In response to these allegations, the court issued a directive for all parties involved to adhere to the decision made at the peace committee meeting. The court stated,
“This Court cannot be a mute spectator and permit perpetuation of the practice of untouchability.”
The District Collector was instructed to ensure that Murugan and his community were allowed to worship at the temple like everyone else. The court further stated,
“It is no doubt true that there is no legal force to the Peace Committee Meeting, but having participated in the same, they are bound by the decision taken therein.”
The Revenue Divisional Officer of the area was also ordered to intervene and take necessary action if any issues arise. Advocate S Rajasekar represented the petitioner, while Special Government Pleader P Subbaraj represented the respondent district authorities, and Advocate M Anbarasan represented the respondent Temple authorities.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle for equality and the eradication of caste-based discrimination in India. The Madras High Court’s strong stance against such practices is a significant step towards ensuring justice and equality for all citizens, irrespective of their caste or community.