Balancing Government Scheme Promotion and Political Neutrality
In a significant hearing, the Delhi High Court recently deliberated on the controversy surrounding ‘PM Modi Selfie Points’, emphasizing the importance of these platforms being used exclusively for promoting government schemes, not for political party promotion. This discussion arises amidst concerns that these selfie points might be leveraged for political advantage rather than their intended purpose.
Also read-Supreme Court Rejects Pawan Khera’s Plea In PM Modi Remark Case (lawchakra.in)
During the hearing, the counsel for petitioners Sarma and Chhokar raised concerns about the misuse of these selfie points. He argued that these platforms, established by various government departments such as the Railways, University Grants Commission (UGC), and Ministry of Defence (MoD), were transcending their original purpose.
“Everything is political. It has nothing to do with the schemes. All these selfie points have placards of the Prime Minister and each one of these is costing ₹6.5 lakh. Hundreds of bureaucrats and army offices have been deployed…They (government ministers/politicians) are saying he (PM Modi) did this in 2002 in Gujarat,”
the counsel stated, indicating a shift from promoting government schemes to political rhetoric.
Also read-Delhi High Court Reviews ED’s Challenge Against Release Of Vivo India Executives (lawchakra.in)
In response, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Chetan Sharma, representing the Central government, presented a contrasting view. He emphasized the government’s commitment to reaching out to citizens, especially those who are yet to benefit from its schemes. ASG Sharma highlighted the positive impact of these initiatives, saying,
“Selfie points being built by the Army is to inspire young women to join the armed forces and tell people about steps towards self-reliance in defense as well as schemes like Agnipath.”
He further elaborated on the extensive reach of these yatras, mentioning their role in screening lakhs of people for tuberculosis and providing other benefits. Sharma clarified that the government’s focus was not limited to promoting the achievements of the past nine years alone.
This hearing in the Delhi High Court sheds light on the evolving role of technology in governance and public engagement. The debate over ‘PM Modi Selfie Points’ underscores the need for a clear distinction between the dissemination of information about government schemes and political campaigning. It highlights the challenges in ensuring that technological tools meant for public awareness and empowerment are not diverted for political messaging. The court’s emphasis on maintaining the non-political nature of these platforms is a crucial step in safeguarding the integrity of government initiatives aimed at public welfare.
Also read-Delhi High Court Grants Bail In Dating App Rape Case (lawchakra.in)
