On Wednesday, the Supreme Court collegium proposed the transfer of two judges from the Delhi High Court, namely Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, following their own requests for the transfers.
Two esteemed judges from the Delhi High Court on Wednesday have officially requested transfers to other high courts. This move, as articulated by the judges themselves, is aimed at promoting the better administration of justice, reflecting the dynamic nature of judicial assignments and the personal and professional considerations that influence such decisions.
Also Read- Bombay High Court Mandates Video Recording For SC/ST Act Proceedings (lawchakra.in)
Justice V Kameswar Rao, a prominent figure in the Delhi High Court, has expressed his desire for a change of location. In a formal communication dated March 4, 2024, Justice Rao requested a transfer to “any other High Court.” The Supreme Court Collegium, respecting his request and considering the broader implications for judicial administration, has resolved to recommend his transfer to the High Court of Karnataka. The Collegium’s resolution highlighted the transfer as a step towards the “interest of better administration of justice,” underscoring the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining optimal functioning and impartiality within the legal system.
Similarly, Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, another respected member of the Delhi High Court bench, has sought relocation. On March 3, 2024, he conveyed his willingness to be transferred to “any Court.” The Collegium, once again stepping in to facilitate this transition, has decided to recommend Justice Sachdeva’s transfer to the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. This decision, like that of Justice Rao’s, is framed within the context of enhancing the administration of justice, ensuring that the judiciary’s operations are as effective and equitable as possible.
These requests and subsequent recommendations by the Collegium are part of the judiciary’s ongoing efforts to address the personal and professional needs of its members while ensuring that the administration of justice remains seamless and efficient. Transfers of high court judges, while not uncommon, are significant events that reflect the judiciary’s adaptive and responsive nature.
The transfers of Justices Rao and Sachdeva are expected to bring fresh perspectives to the High Courts of Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh, respectively. Such movements within the judicial system are essential for maintaining the balance and distribution of legal expertise across the country. They also serve as a mechanism for addressing various administrative and personal factors that can impact a judge’s effectiveness and well-being.
As the legal community and the public await the official implementation of these transfers, the decisions underscore the judiciary’s commitment to its core values of fairness, efficiency, and justice. The moves also highlight the personal dimensions of judicial service, acknowledging that judges, like all professionals, may seek new environments and challenges in pursuit of personal growth and professional fulfillment.
In conclusion, the recommended transfers of Justice V Kameswar Rao to the Karnataka High Court and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva to the Madhya Pradesh High Court mark a notable moment in India’s judicial landscape. These changes, prompted by the judges’ requests and facilitated by the Collegium’s resolutions, reflect the dynamic interplay between individual aspirations and the collective goal of a robust, effective judiciary.