Delhi High Court Grants Bail in Dating App Rape Case

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Rethinking Consent in Digital Age Relationships

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man accused of raping a woman he met on a dating app, a decision that delves into the nuances of consent and online relationships. This case, as detailed in a report by media, offers a complex view of the interactions and expectations in relationships formed through digital platforms.

Justice Vikas Mahajan, presiding over the case, granted bail to the accused, underscoring the fact that the complainant and the accused had met on the dating app “Hinge,” and not on a matrimonial platform. This distinction was crucial in the court’s assessment of the case. Justice Mahajan observed,

“It is not in dispute that the complainant and the petitioner met on a dating App ‘Hinge’ and not on a matrimonial App. There has been an exchange of numerous WhatsApp messages between them, and in none of the messages, there is any promise proposal of marriage mooted by the petitioner.”

The court’s analysis extended to the nature of the relationship following their initial meeting. Notably, the complainant continued her association with the accused even after discovering that he had misrepresented his educational qualifications. They stayed together at an Airbnb for four days, during which they had multiple sexual encounters. This continuation of the relationship, despite the revelation of the accused’s falsehood, was a significant factor in the court’s deliberation.

Another pivotal aspect of the case involved explicit photographs and videos of the complainant found on the accused’s mobile phone. Addressing this, Justice Mahajan noted,

“As regards the obscene photographs and videos of the prosecutrix recovered from the mobile phone of the petitioner by FSL, the prosecutrix in her cross-examination has admitted that such photographs and videos were taken with her consent.”

He further added,

“In the aforesaid factual backdrop, prima facie, the sexual intercourse appears to be consensual and there does not seem to be any false promise of marriage or the consent having been obtained on a misconception of any fact.”

This judgment by the Delhi High Court is a critical examination of consent in the context of modern, digitally-initiated relationships. It underscores the importance of understanding the dynamics of consent, especially in relationships that begin on online platforms. The decision reflects the evolving legal perspective on relationships in the digital age, where traditional notions of courtship and consent are being reexamined.

The case sets a significant precedent in understanding consent in the context of relationships formed through dating apps. It emphasizes the judiciary’s role in navigating the complex dynamics of consent and relationships in the digital era, highlighting the need for clear communication and mutual understanding in such interactions.

author

Vaibhav Ojha

ADVOCATE | LLM | BBA.LLB | SENIOR LEGAL EDITOR @ LAW CHAKRA

Similar Posts