Today(on 5th September),The Delhi High Court issued a contempt of court notice to Wikipedia for allegedly failing to disclose information on users responsible for defamatory edits to ANI’s Wikipedia page. Justice Navin Chawla criticized Wikipedia’s non-compliance with the court’s orders.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: Today(on 5th September), The Delhi High Court has issued a contempt of court notice to Wikipedia following ANI’s allegations that the online platform failed to comply with a previous court order. The order demanded Wikipedia disclose information regarding users who allegedly made defamatory edits to ANI’s Wikipedia page.
Background of the Case
The controversy erupted when ANI, a major news agency, sued Wikipedia, alleging that defamatory edits were permitted on its Wikipedia page. ANI claimed that these edits falsely labeled the agency as a “propaganda tool” for the Indian government, damaging its reputation. The agency argued that Wikipedia’s failure to control such content made it complicit in disseminating false information.
In an earlier hearing, the Delhi High Court had instructed Wikipedia to disclose the identities of three individuals responsible for the defamatory edits. However, ANI contended that Wikipedia had not followed this order, leading the agency to file a contempt application with the court.
During today’s hearing (September 5), Justice Navin Chawla expressed strong disapproval of Wikipedia’s actions, emphasizing that any further non-compliance would be unacceptable.
He stated-
“I will impose contempt… The fact that Defendant No. 1 [Wikipedia] is not based in India is irrelevant. We will consider halting your business operations here and may request the government to block Wikipedia. This argument has been made before; if you don’t want to adhere to Indian laws, you should refrain from operating in India.”
The court’s statement highlighted that Wikipedia’s claim of not being an entity based in India was inadequate to escape legal repercussions. Justice Chawla had previously made it clear that this defense would not be acceptable, emphasizing that the platform must adhere to Indian laws and regulations if it operates within the country.
Court Orders Wikipedia Representative to Appear
In response to Wikipedia’s failure to comply with previous court orders, Justice Chawla has instructed that an authorized representative of Wikipedia must appear in person before the Court on October 25. This upcoming hearing will assess the platform’s position on the matter, and non-compliance could lead to significant consequences for Wikipedia’s operations in India.
The court cautioned that if the issue continues, contempt of court proceedings could be initiated. Justice Chawla’s remarks underscore the seriousness of the situation and the potential for further legal action if Wikipedia does not fully cooperate with the court’s directives.
ALSO READ: BREAKING | “Entitled to Have Their Opinion”: Delhi HC Summons Wikipedia in Defamation Suit by ANI
ANI’s Allegations and Legal Perspective
ANI has consistently argued that Wikipedia allowed defamatory content that undermined the news agency’s credibility. The content in question, which labeled ANI as a “propaganda tool,” allegedly damaged the agency’s reputation among its readers and potential partners. ANI’s legal team, led by Advocate Sidhant Kumar, has called for Wikipedia to disclose the identities of those responsible for the edits.
The case centers on the protection of reputation and the accountability of online platforms in addressing defamatory content. While Wikipedia maintains that its user-edited model means content is created and modified by its users, the High Court has taken the position that this does not exempt the platform from responsibility for the defamatory material published on its site.
Wikipedia’s Defense and Court’s Rejection
During the hearing, Wikipedia’s counsel, Advocate Tine Abraham, requested additional time to present submissions, citing the platform’s non-Indian base as a reason. Justice Chawla, however, was unimpressed with this argument, pointing out that Wikipedia had previously used this defense.
Justice Chawla firmly rejected the excuse, emphasizing that it had been dismissed in earlier cases involving Wikipedia. The court reiterated that Wikipedia must comply with Indian laws if it operates in the country, and its physical location does not exempt it from legal responsibilities in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
Potential Legal Ramifications for Wikipedia
The High Court’s warning carries substantial implications. If Wikipedia fails to comply with the court’s orders, it could face severe legal consequences, potentially including a ban on operating in India. This case could set a precedent for how legal systems worldwide address global platforms regarding their hosted content and accountability.
Justice Chawla’s remarks indicate that non-compliance might result in business restrictions for Wikipedia in India.
“We will close your business activities here and may request the government to block Wikipedia.”
-he remarked sternly, signaling the court’s resolve in ensuring adherence to its orders.
FOLLOW US ON X FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
Background of the Case
The controversy began when ANI, a leading news agency, filed a lawsuit against Wikipedia, claiming that defamatory edits had been allowed on its Wikipedia page. These edits, according to ANI, falsely referred to the agency as a “propaganda tool” for the current Indian government, harming its reputation. ANI argued that Wikipedia, by not controlling such defamatory content, was complicit in spreading false information.
In a previous hearing, the Delhi High Court had summoned Wikipedia, ordering it to reveal the identities of three individuals who were responsible for these defamatory edits. However, ANI alleged that Wikipedia had not complied with this directive, prompting the agency to file a contempt application with the court.
Strong Remarks from Justice Navin Chawla
During Thursday’s hearing, Justice Navin Chawla expressed his dissatisfaction with Wikipedia’s conduct, making it clear that non-compliance would not be tolerated. He stated,
“I will impose contempt…It is not a question of Defendant No 1 [Wikipedia] not being an entity in India. We will close your business transactions here. We will ask the government to block Wikipedia…Earlier also you people have taken this argument. If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India.”
The court’s statement underlined that Wikipedia’s argument of not being an entity based in India was insufficient to avoid legal consequences. Justice Chawla had made it clear in previous matters that this defense would not hold, emphasizing that the platform is responsible for its operations and compliance with Indian laws if it conducts business in the country.
Court Orders Wikipedia Representative to Appear
In response to the lack of compliance with the court’s earlier orders, Justice Chawla directed that an authorized representative of Wikipedia must appear personally before the Court on October 25. The next hearing will determine the platform’s stance on the matter, and failure to comply could have serious repercussions for the platform’s operations in India.
The court warned Wikipedia that if the issue persisted, contempt of court proceedings would be initiated. Justice Chawla’s remarks reflect the gravity of the situation and the potential for further legal action should Wikipedia fail to cooperate fully with the court’s orders.
ANI’s Allegations and Legal Standpoint
ANI has firmly maintained that Wikipedia allowed the publishing of defamatory content that directly targeted the news agency’s credibility. By referring to ANI as a “propaganda tool,” the content in question allegedly tarnished the agency’s image, particularly in the eyes of its readers and potential partners. ANI’s legal team, represented by Advocate Sidhant Kumar, has pushed for transparency from Wikipedia regarding the identities of the individuals responsible for the edits.
The issue revolves around the protection of reputation and the responsibilities of online platforms in curbing defamatory content. Wikipedia, being a user-edited platform, holds that the content posted on its pages is created and modified by users, but the High Court has taken the stance that this does not absolve the platform from taking responsibility for the defamatory content published on its pages.
Wikipedia’s Defense and Court’s Rejection
During the hearing, Wikipedia’s counsel, represented by Advocate Tine Abraham, argued that the platform needed more time to present its submissions in court due to the fact that Wikipedia is not based in India. However, this argument did not sit well with Justice Chawla, who pointed out that this was not the first time Wikipedia had presented such a defense.
Justice Chawla categorically rejected the platform’s excuse and noted that the argument had already been dismissed in previous legal matters involving Wikipedia. The court reiterated that Wikipedia must adhere to Indian laws if it wishes to operate in the country and that the platform’s physical location does not exempt it from legal obligations in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
Potential Legal Ramifications for Wikipedia
The implications of the High Court’s warning are significant. Should Wikipedia fail to comply with the court’s orders, the platform could face severe legal consequences, including being blocked from operating in India. This case sets a precedent for how legal systems in various countries may approach global platforms in relation to the content hosted and the platform’s accountability.
Justice Chawla’s comments suggest that non-compliance could lead to business restrictions for Wikipedia in India.
“We will close your business transactions here. We will ask the government to block Wikipedia,” he remarked sternly, signaling the court’s resolve in ensuring adherence to its orders.