In a landmark ruling, the Allahabad High Court has made a significant observation regarding the applicability of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act) in instances of caste-based verbal abuse occurring within private premises. The judgment, delivered by Justice Suneet Kumar, provides a nuanced interpretation of the Act’s scope, particularly in relation to the location of the alleged offense.
Also read-Allahabad High Court Reserves Judgment In High-Profile Gyanvapi Mosque Case (lawchakra.in)
The case under consideration involved an accusation of caste-based verbal abuse. However, Justice Kumar noted that the accused did not abuse the complainant by caste name in a public setting. This distinction is crucial as the Act is particularly concerned with protecting members of vulnerable communities from abuse in public places. The Court stated,
“An offence under the Act, 1989 would be made out when a member of the vulnerable section of the society is subjected to indignities, humiliations and harassment in any place within the public view.”
The Court further observed that the complainant had not specified the nature of the abuses, which led to the conclusion that the allegations did not constitute an offense under Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act. This section is designed to safeguard individuals from caste-based atrocities in public spaces.
Also read-Justice Gangopadhyay Advocates For CBI Police Stations In West Bengal (lawchakra.in)
Moreover, the judgment emphasized the significance of the location where the alleged abuse occurs. The incident in question reportedly took place inside the complainant’s house, a private setting, and not in the public view. The Court elaborated,
“It is further observed that as per his own case, the respondent No.3 [complainant] clearly stated in the F.I.R. and in his statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC that whatever incident took place that took place inside his house, thus, it is not a place within a public view as no outsider was sitting in the room nor anyone has seen the alleged incident.”
Additionally, the Court highlighted the absence of independent witnesses supporting the complainant’s case. The lack of witnesses present inside the house during the alleged incident further weakened the complainant’s position.
In conclusion, the Allahabad High Court’s decision brings clarity to the interpretation of the SC/ST Act, particularly regarding the location and public visibility of the alleged offense. This ruling is a significant contribution to the legal understanding of the Act, delineating its application in scenarios where the alleged abuse occurs in private, away from the public eye. The decision underscores the importance of context in applying the provisions of the SC/ST Act, offering critical guidance for future cases.
Also read-Chhattisgarh High Court Confronts Skin Color Bias In Landmark Divorce Ruling (lawchakra.in)
