The Allahabad High Court criticized the use of threatening messages like ‘dekhte hi goli maar di jayegi’ (will be shot on sight) on military signboards, advocating for a shift to gentler language. Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav emphasized the negative impact of such words, especially on children.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
UTTAR PRADESH: The Allahabad High Court has called for a change in the language used on military installation signboards. Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav highlighted concerns over phrases like ‘dekhte hi goli maar di jayegi’ (will be shot on sight) and ‘trespassers will be shot’, which are commonly seen on such signboards. The Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav emphasized the negative impact these harsh words could have, particularly on children and the general public who frequent these areas.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav pointed out that while security measures are essential for military installations, the wording used should be less intimidating and more considerate of the civilian population’s sensitivities.
“The language used, such as ‘dekhte hi goli maar di jayegi,’ is inappropriate, particularly when military installations are situated in public places frequented by children. These words have a negative impact, so the Central Government should exercise caution. Lighter language should replace phrases like ‘Trespassers will be shot’.”
-the Court’s May 31 order stated.
The judge suggested that alternatives like ‘strict action would be taken’ could be used instead, which while still conveying a stern warning, do so in a manner that is less threatening and more aligned with a civil tone. This recommendation comes as a response to growing concerns that such explicit warnings might instill unnecessary fear and anxiety among civilians, especially children who might pass by these signs.
This observation by the Allahabad High Court opens up a broader discussion on how military and other security-sensitive areas communicate their boundaries and restrictions to the public. The court’s call for a softer approach reflects a sensitivity to the psychological impact of public signage and a move towards more community-friendly practices in security enforcement.
ALSO READ: No Filing Private Photos Without Court Approval: Allahabad HC
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a Nepali citizen who had been arrested for illegally entering an Air Force station in an intoxicated state earlier this year. The individual faced charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Official Secrets Act for this incident, which occurred in February.
During the proceedings, the Court decided to include the Central government as a party to the case, emphasizing the need to scrutinize and bolster measures aimed at preventing unlawful intrusions, trespassing, and unauthorized access to defense land. The case highlighted ongoing security concerns despite existing precautions.
The Court was informed that despite various security protocols intended to thwart intrusions into defense stations, instances of trespassing remained alarmingly frequent.
In an affidavit, the Air Force conveyed that-
“In the aftermath of terror attacks at Pathankot Air Base and Uri Army Base, numerous measures have been implemented to bolster the physical security of defense installations/stations.”
One significant detail that emerged during the hearing was the presence of stark warning messages such as “trespassers will be shot” prominently displayed outside Army and Air Force installations nationwide. The Court noted these messages and suggested that the use of such direct language might be softened, even though it concurred that trespassers should be strictly barred from entering defense premises.
Regarding the Nepali citizen involved in the case, the Court ultimately decided to release him on bail. The accused’s counsel, Etvir Limbu, argued that the man was illiterate and had traveled to India in search of employment. The Court was convinced that the man’s entry into the Air Force station lacked any malicious intent.
In its decision to grant bail, the Court took into account that the criminal trial would likely extend over a considerable period. It also found no substantial evidence suggesting any risk of tampering with the evidence. Advocate Pradeep Kumar represented the accused in this matter.
ALSO READ: Restricted Two Lawyers from Entering District Court: Allahabad HC
The Air Force was represented by Additional Solicitor General SP Singh and Advocate Purnendu Kumar Singh, who put forth the institution’s concerns and the ongoing efforts to reinforce security at defense installations.
Case Title:
Etvir Limbu vs State of UP
