The reservation system in India is a crucial policy designed to provide historically marginalized communities with equitable access to education, employment, and political representation. Communities such as Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) have long faced discrimination and social exclusion. The reservation policy was introduced as a corrective measure to counteract these historical injustices and promote social inclusivity.
The reservation system in India is a crucial policy designed to provide historically marginalized communities with equitable access to education, employment, and political representation. Communities such as Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) have long faced discrimination and social exclusion. The reservation policy was introduced as a corrective measure to counteract these historical injustices and promote social inclusivity.
Objectives of the Reservation System
The reservation system serves multiple purposes, all aimed at fostering an inclusive and equitable society. The key objectives include:
- Promoting Social Equality – By offering opportunities to historically disadvantaged communities, the reservation policy ensures equal access to education, employment, and governance.
- Reducing Economic Disparities – Reserved positions in government jobs and educational institutions provide financial stability and upward mobility to economically weaker sections.
- Correcting Historical Injustices – The system acknowledges and attempts to rectify centuries of discrimination and social exclusion faced by SCs, STs, and OBCs.
- Enhancing Diversity – Encouraging representation from varied social groups contributes to an inclusive and diverse workforce and leadership.
- Strengthening Political Representation – Reserved seats in legislatures ensure that marginalized communities have a voice in decision-making processes.
Evolution of Caste-Based Reservation in India
The concept of caste-based reservation has evolved over time, influenced by various historical events and policy decisions. Below is a timeline of key developments:
- Pre-Independence Initiatives:
- In 1882, social reformers William Hunter and Jyotirao Phule proposed a caste-based reservation system to address social inequalities.
- The Communal Award of 1933, introduced by British Prime Minister Ramsay Macdonald, provided separate electorates for different religious and social communities, including Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, Europeans, and Dalits.
- The Poona Pact of 1932, signed between Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, replaced separate electorates for Dalits with a single Hindu electorate, but with reserved seats for the depressed classes.
- Post-Independence Implementation:
- After India gained independence, the Constituent Assembly, led by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, incorporated reservation policies into the Indian Constitution to uplift SCs and STs. Initially, reservations were introduced for 10 years, with provisions for extensions based on social need.
- Over time, recognizing continued inequalities, these reservations were periodically extended through constitutional amendments.
- Expansion to OBCs:
- In 1991, the reservation policy was expanded to include Other Backward Classes (OBCs) following the recommendations of the Mandal Commission.
- The 104th Constitutional Amendment Act (2019) further extended the reservation period for SCs and STs in legislatures until 2030.
The Mandal Commission and Its Impact
The Mandal Commission, established in 1978 under the leadership of B.P. Mandal, aimed to identify socially and educationally backward classes across India. Key recommendations included:
- 27% reservation in government jobs for OBCs, estimating that they made up 52% of the population.
- Identification of 3,743 OBC castes and an additional 2,108 underprivileged groups.
- Expansion of reservation policies to ensure better representation of socially disadvantaged groups in public institutions.
The implementation of the Mandal Commission’s recommendations in 1991 was a watershed moment in Indian politics, triggering widespread debates and protests. Despite resistance, it significantly contributed to increasing OBC representation in government jobs and education.
Who Introduced the Reservation System in India?
The roots of the reservation policy can be traced back to 1882, when William Hunter and Jyotirao Phule advocated for caste-based affirmative action. However, the modern reservation system took shape under British Prime Minister Ramsay Macdonald, who introduced the Communal Award in 1933. The policy of separate electorates was later modified by the Poona Pact (1932), ensuring that Dalits remained part of a unified Hindu electorate but retained reserved legislative seats.
Following independence, the Indian Constitution (1950) institutionalized reservations for SCs and STs, with subsequent amendments expanding its scope to OBCs and economically weaker sections.
Reservation in Contemporary India
Today, India’s reservation system has undergone multiple changes to accommodate different marginalized groups:
- SCs and STs: Originally granted reservations in education, employment, and legislatures for 10 years, this has been periodically extended.
- OBCs: Introduced in 1991 following the Mandal Commission’s recommendations, providing 27% reservation in government jobs and education.
- Economically Weaker Sections (EWS): In 2019, the 103rd Constitutional Amendment introduced 10% reservation for economically disadvantaged groups from unreserved categories.
Provisions of Reservation in the Indian Constitution for SCs, STs, OBCs, and EWS
The Indian Constitution provides a reservation system to ensure social justice and equal opportunities for historically disadvantaged communities. Based on the Mandal Commission’s recommendations, Other Backward Classes (OBCs) were granted 27% reservation, while Scheduled Castes (SCs) received 15%, and Scheduled Tribes (STs) were allocated 7.5% of reserved seats in government jobs and educational institutions.
Furthermore, the 103rd Constitutional Amendment, enacted on 14th January 2019, introduced a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in the general category under Articles 15(6) and 16(6). This EWS reservation was implemented in addition to the existing 50% reservation cap for SC, ST, and OBC categories.
Constitutional Articles and Amendments Related to Reservation
The following articles and amendments form the legal foundation for India’s reservation policy:
- Article 15(4): Allows the State to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, including SCs and STs.
- Article 15(6): Introduced through the 103rd Amendment, this article provides 10% reservation for EWS in educational institutions (excluding minority institutions).
- Article 16(4): Permits the reservation of appointments in public employment for any backward class of citizens that the State finds inadequately represented.
- Article 16(4A): Inserted through the 77th Amendment (1995), enabling reservation in promotions for SC and ST employees in government services.
- Article 16(4B): Added through the 81st Amendment (2000), allowing states to carry forward unfilled SC/ST vacancies without breaching the 50% reservation ceiling.
- Article 16(6): Introduced by the 103rd Amendment, enabling 10% reservation for EWS in public employment.
- Article 330 and 332: Mandate reserved seats for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies, ensuring political representation.
- Article 243D: Provides for the reservation of SCs and STs in Panchayati Raj Institutions.
- Article 243T: Mandates reservation for SCs and STs in Municipalities.
- Article 335: Ensures that the claims of SCs and STs in public employment are considered without compromising administrative efficiency.
- Part XVI: Covers various provisions related to reservation for SCs and STs in legislatures and public employment.
Reservation Policy in India
The reservation system aims to promote social justice, ensure equal opportunities, and bridge socio-economic disparities by providing representation to historically marginalized communities.
Educational Institutions – Reserved seats in schools, colleges, and universities, including prestigious institutions like IITs and NITs.
Public Employment – Quotas for SCs, STs, OBCs, and EWS candidates in government jobs.
Political Representation – Reserved constituencies in Parliament, State Assemblies, Panchayats, and Municipalities.
ALSO READ: [Nagaland Reservation Policy] 33% Reservation for Women in Nagaland Finally Approved
Reservation Percentage in India for Different Categories
The current reservation distribution in India is as follows:
| Category | Reservation Percentage |
|---|---|
| Scheduled Castes (SCs) | 15% |
| Scheduled Tribes (STs) | 7.5% |
| Other Backward Classes (OBCs) | 27% |
| Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) | 10% |
| Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBDs) | 4% |
While the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Indra Sawhney case (1992) set a 50% cap on reservations, the 103rd Amendment (2019) introduced an additional 10% quota for EWS, exceeding this limit in some states.
Reservation for SC, ST, and OBC Categories
The reservation policy primarily benefits three socially disadvantaged groups:
1. Scheduled Castes (SCs)
- SCs belong to communities that were historically subjected to untouchability and severe social exclusion.
- 15% of government jobs, educational seats, and legislative positions are reserved for SC candidates.
2. Scheduled Tribes (STs)
- STs include tribal communities living in remote areas with distinct cultural identities and socio-economic challenges.
- A 7.5% reservation ensures their inclusion in education, employment, and governance.
3. Other Backward Classes (OBCs)
- OBCs consist of communities that, while not classified as SCs or STs, still experience social and educational backwardness.
- The Mandal Commission Report (1980) led to a 27% reservation for OBCs in government jobs and educational institutions.
Caste-Based Reservation in Education
Educational institutions in India, particularly government-funded and publicly managed colleges, allocate a specific number of seats for reserved categories to promote equitable access to higher education.
- Government Institutions: A designated percentage of seats is reserved for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to enhance educational opportunities for underprivileged groups.
- Private Institutions: In some states, private colleges and universities are also required to implement reservation policies, ensuring representation for SC, ST, and OBC students.
- Premier Institutes (IITs, NITs, Medical Colleges): Renowned institutions such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), National Institutes of Technology (NITs), and government medical colleges adhere to reservation guidelines to foster diversity and inclusion in higher education.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases on Reservation in India
Several key Supreme Court judgments have significantly influenced India’s reservation framework:
- Indra Sawhney Case (1992) – The Mandal Commission Case
- Upheld the 27% reservation for OBCs in public employment and education.
- Established a 50% cap on total reservations to maintain a balance with merit-based selection.
- Introduced the “creamy layer” concept, which excludes the socially and economically advanced OBCs from availing of reservation benefits.
- M. Nagaraj Case (2006)
- Affirmed the validity of reservation in promotions for SCs and STs but introduced conditions such as quantifiable data on backwardness, inadequate representation, and administrative efficiency before implementing such reservations.
- Janhit Abhiyan Case (2022) – EWS Quota Verdict
- Upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment, which introduced 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) within the general category.
- Affirmed that economic criteria alone could be used as a basis for affirmative action without violating constitutional principles.
Impact of Reservation on Society
Reservation policies have played a crucial role in social transformation, particularly in providing opportunities to historically marginalized communities. However, they have also been subject to debates and criticism.
Positive Impacts:
- Increased access to education and employment for SCs, STs, and OBCs.
- Enhanced political representation for disadvantaged groups.
- Reduction in social inequalities through affirmative action.
Challenges and Criticism:
- Critics argue that reservations may compromise merit-based selection, leading to inefficiencies in governance and public institutions.
- Social tensions and resentment have emerged among non-reserved category groups.
- The system does not always benefit the most disadvantaged within reserved categories due to disparities within these groups.
Call for Reforms:
- There is ongoing debate on refining reservation policies to incorporate economic criteria alongside caste-based reservations.
- Suggestions have been made to introduce periodic reviews to assess the effectiveness of reservations.
Future of Reservation Policy in India– Is it fair?
Reservation is justifiable as long as it serves as a means of positive discrimination, ensuring upliftment and equal opportunities for the socially and economically disadvantaged sections of society. However, when it begins to undermine societal harmony and grants privileges to certain groups at the expense of others for political gains, it should be reconsidered and phased out.
The exclusion of certain communities from reservation policies often fosters resentment and prejudice against those who benefit from them, leading to social divisions. Additionally, when individuals and groups aspire for backwardness rather than striving for progress, it hinders national growth and development.
Meritocracy should not be compromised by lowering entry standards; instead, support should be extended through financial aid and skill development programs to empower the underprivileged. To strike a balance between justice for marginalized communities, fairness for the unreserved sections, and overall systemic efficiency, a strong political commitment is essential.
READ MORE REPORTS ON RESERVATION
FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE