The Saket Court raised issues with BJP leader Suresh Nakhua’s affidavit in his defamation suit against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee regarding a video from July 7. The court found it defective and ordered Nakhua to submit a revised version. The case involves allegations of defamatory claims affecting Nakhua’s reputation.
The Supreme Court will hear Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against a defamation case on Monday. Kejriwal admitted to making a mistake by retweeting a controversial video. The case involves a three-judge bench and revolves around a retweet made by Kejriwal, which the High Court deemed defamatory. The case also highlights the responsibility of public figures in sharing content.
District Judge Gunjan Gupta of Saket Court issued a summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee on July 19 in response to a defamation case filed by BJP leader Suresh Karamshi Nakhua. Rathee is accused of labeling Nakhua as a “violent and abusive” troll in a video, leading to widespread condemnation and ridicule against him. The next hearing is scheduled for August 6.
The legal saga began when Arvind Kejriwal retweeted a video titled “BJP IT Cell Part II” in May 2018, leading to a defamation complaint by Vikas Sankrityayan. Video made by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which allegedly contained defamatory content against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) IT Cell. Supreme Court Extends Stay on Against Arvind Kejriwal. The […]
On Monday, the Supreme Court ordered a trial court to refrain from taking any coercive actions against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a 2018 defamation case. The case involves Kejriwal’s retweet of a video by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee. Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal admitted to the Supreme Court that he had made an error by […]