Today, On 9th May, The Madras High Court voiced concerns about YouTube channels spreading harmful content, emphasizing the need for stricter regulation and responsible content creation online. Justice K. Kumaresh Babu highlighted the serious impact of such content on public discourse and called for regulatory measures to address this pressing issue. The court postponed an anticipatory bail hearing for a week.
Today, On 29th April, The Supreme Court extended the stay on hate speech proceedings against Tamil Nadu BJP Chief K Annamalai, reflecting ongoing legal deliberations and the complexity of balancing free speech with legal constraints. The case involves allegations of hate speech made during a political rally, with the next hearing scheduled for September 9. This high-profile case has sparked significant interest due to its potential impact on political discourse boundaries and legal regulations.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted police protection to activists involved in a case against Elvish Yadav, known for allegations involving snake venom at parties. The court emphasized the need for security, given threats faced by the activists. This case showcases the challenges in wildlife protection cases and the risks for activists.
The Madras High Court on Tuesday has directed YouTube LLC to deposit the revenue generated from a video posted by Youtuber and public commentator A Shankar, popularly known as Savukku Shankar. The video in question allegedly contained defamatory statements against the renowned media house, Lyca Productions. This landmark decision highlights the judiciary’s stance on the […]
The Delhi High Court amended an interim injunction in a defamation lawsuit filed by Union Minister Smriti Irani against three Congress leaders. The modification now requires social media platforms to promptly remove content deemed defamatory towards Irani and her daughter. If the content persists, Irani can directly approach the platforms, who have three days to assess and remove it.
Two renowned Indian YouTubers, Sandeep Maheshwari and Vivek Bindra, are entangled in a legal dispute. A Haryana court ruling restrains them from publishing defamatory content against each other due to their significant influence on the youth. The case highlights the legal complexities in handling digital content disputes and emphasizes the responsibility of social media influencers.
![[NDPS ACT] Delhi High Court Grants Parole of Three Weeks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/delhi-high-court-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court is exploring options to obtain crucial information from a YouTube channel accused of defaming Amul. Despite Google’s reliance on GDPR for non-disclosure, the court is considering issuing letters rogatory through the government or directing Google Ireland to comply with GDPR requirements. This reflects the Court’s commitment to addressing cross-border legal challenges.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued show cause notices to YouTube and Facebook officials in response to a contempt petition, alleging their failure to remove objectionable posts targeting Hindu spiritual leader Acharya Dhirendra Shastri. The court directed key officials to respond within four weeks, emphasizing the legal responsibilities of social media platforms in protecting individual reputations.