Kerala: The Kerala High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/S. M.D. Esthappan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and its proprietor, M.D. Esthappan. The petitions challenged the enforcement proceedings initiated by Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).
Today, On 6th March, The Supreme Court scheduled hearings for pleas challenging the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment Today. This ruling upheld key provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), granting extensive powers to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Several petitioners argue that the verdict violates constitutional rights and needs reconsideration.
The Kerala High Court that persons with disabilities are not entitled to reservations for government pleader and public prosecutor positions. The court emphasized that these roles require specific qualifications and are not subject to the usual reservation policies. It further stated that no one has an inherent right to be appointed to these posts. The verdict clarifies the legal position on disability reservations in such appointments.
The Kerala High Court emphasized the need for responsible media reporting, cautioning against “media trials” that presuppose guilt or innocence in ongoing cases. While freedom of speech is fundamental, it must not overshadow the judiciary’s role or the accused’s right to a fair trial, warning against prejudicing public opinion.
Today, On 3rd October, the Supreme Court upheld the tax department’s position, confirming that updated Income Tax Act provisions from April 1, 2021, must be applied. This ruling affects approximately 90,000 reassessment notices issued during the pandemic, resolving conflicts between old and new laws and setting precedents for future tax disputes and limitations.
Today, On 20th August, The Gujarat High Court criticized the State for submitting poorly drafted affidavits, urging them to “put their house in order.” Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal expressed concern that the affidavits lacked proper para-wise replies to the writ petitions. The Court reprimanded the State’s lawyers and emphasized the need for better affidavit drafting to avoid jeopardizing the State’s case.
Today, On 30th July, The Rouse Avenue Court scheduled August 12 for hearing the CBI’s chargesheet against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five others in the excise policy case. The case involves alleged irregularities in the policy’s implementation, with the court’s decision holding significance for Kejriwal’s legal standing. The High Court reserved its decision on Kejriwal’s bail plea and plea for interim bail.
