Today, On 22nd May, The Supreme Court raised concerns about wealthy MBBS students from private institutions fulfilling national healthcare obligations. Scrutiny aims to address disparities in medical service delivery. Justices questioned if private college attendance exempts students from rural service, proposing a bond for NOC with an option to challenge. The court’s inquiry will advance to the next hearing for clarifications.
Today, On 21st May, Hotels and bar owners in Mumbai challenge the ‘dry day’ on the day of poll results, stating it harms their business and is unnecessary after voting. The Bombay High Court will consider the plea, which seeks relaxation of the alcohol sales ban during this period due to economic concerns for the hospitality industry.
![[Amit Shah's Doctored Video Case] High Court Denies Lunch Motion Moved By Delhi Police](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-25-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Telangana High Court rejected the Delhi police’s lunch motion on 9th May, in the Amit Shah morphed video case, allowing further investigation. The court instructed the police to follow due process and approach the lower court for necessary actions. The case involves allegations of doctoring a video clip of Amit Shah, leading to arrests and ongoing investigations by the Delhi and Hyderabad police.
Today(on 23rd April),The Madras High Court expressed concern over the prolonged absence of Vice Chancellors in three Tamil Nadu universities. The court emphasized the need for educational excellence and prioritizing the appointment process. The inclusion of a UGC nominee in the search panel for Madras University’s VC selection was urged. Internal disputes should not overshadow academic excellence.
A 25-year-old woman from Mumbai filed a civil suit against BJP’s Gorakhpur MP Ravi Kishan, claiming he is her biological father. She seeks a DNA test, legal recognition, and an injunction against Kishan denying paternity. Legal action includes quashing an FIR and challenging its jurisdiction. The case unfolds amidst family disputes with allegations and counterclaims.
The Madras High Court allowed BJP President J P Nadda’s rally in Tamil Nadu, stating that mere traffic disruptions not sufficient grounds for denial. The political rallies aimed to campaign for the upcoming Lok Sabha Election. The court instructed approval of an alternative route with police protection, ultimately granting the petition.
Today (5th April): The Election Commission opposed DMK’s writ petition on EVM design in the Madras High Court, stating that EVMs have been used since the 1980s without proven tampering incidents. The petition questioned the placement of VVPAT printers and sought procedures for EVM approval and guidelines for returning officers. The court adjourned further hearing to June 20.
Today (4th April): The Calcutta High Court has accepted Tata Steel’s writ petition challenging the denial of a loan waiver from the Steel Development Fund (SDF), where the loan amount totaled Rs 2,751.17 crore. This follows the Union Ministry of Steel rejecting their appeal, sparking the recent filing and first hearing for this case.
On Wednesday(March 27),The Madras High Court dismissed a petition challenging Tamil Nadu’s election notification, ensuring the scheduled elections proceed as planned. The petitioner sought to advance the vote counting date, but the court ruled it lacked legal basis and didn’t address significant public concern. The ruling upholds the electoral process’s sanctity and the Election Commission’s authority.
On Tuesday(12th March),The Telangana High Court directs petitioners to serve notices in a Rs 25,000-cr land scam case linked to the Dharani Act. Allegations include a four-decade fraud involving bogus transactions and concealment of prior land sales. The case has sparked legal and political battles, with ongoing demands for criminal charges and a Special Investigating Team.