Yesterday, On 7th September, The Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board claimed ownership of the land where a mosque in Sanjauli Colony is located but stated it had “no idea who constructed the additional four floors.” Meanwhile, local residents filed an application to become a party in the case, claiming the land belongs to the state government’s revenue department. The issue will be further discussed in the next hearing set for October 5. Two Hindu organizations protested for the mosque’s demolition, labeling it illegal, and the matter stirred debate in the Vidhan Sabha. Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu emphasized respect for all religions and peaceful protests, but emphasized that no one would be permitted to take the law into their own hands.
The Allahabad High Court decided to reopen the long-standing Shahi Idgah dispute and schedule a hearing for the Muslim community on June 4. The contentious land dispute involves the Shahi Idgah mosque and the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura, with the involvement of the Waqf Board adding complexity to the matter. The upcoming decision holds significant anticipation.
Today, On 31st May, The Allahabad High Court reserved judgment on the Krishna Janmasthan-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. Hindu litigants seek to challenge the existence of the Shahi Idgah mosque, claiming it was built on the birthplace of Lord Krishna, while the Muslim side argues that the suits are barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The case has historical, religious, and legal significance, and its outcome could set a precedent for future disputes over religious sites.
In a legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, Hindu representatives reported missing property documents, complicating the case. The Hindu side challenges the Waqf Board’s ownership claim and the alleged compromise. The Muslim side argues the suit is time-barred. The High Court scheduled the next hearing for May 20. The case continues to draw attention.
Today, On 7th May, The Allahabad High Court emphasized the impact of the Waqf Board in the Shahi Idgah dispute, addressing property ownership and religious rights. The case presents broader societal debates on religious sites and legal interpretations, shaping discussions on cultural heritage and communal harmony in India. The involvement of the Waqf Board and the court’s ruling add complexity to the matter, creating anticipation for the Supreme Court’s decision.
Today, 30th April, The Delhi High Court exposed illegal constructions on Waqf properties, urging urgent action for safeguarding their sanctity. The court criticized mismanagement and unauthorized construction amidst disputes between the Waqf Board and the Delhi Development Authority. It also highlighted concerns regarding the administrator’s role and recommended actions, awaiting further hearings on May 8.
Today (21st March): The Delhi High Court issued a notice to the Delhi government and the Delhi Waqf Board regarding their use of public funds to pay salaries to imams and muezzins, following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The case challenges the government’s policy, citing violations of secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution and concerns about potential requests from other religious institutions.
The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging the Sunehri Bagh Mosque demolition, citing pending similar petitions. The court noted the Delhi Waqf Board’s actions to protect waqf properties and closed the petition. The petitioner’s request to quash a public notice seeking mosque removal due to traffic congestion was also mentioned as the proceedings continue before a single judge.
Delhi: The Rouse Avenue Court on Monday (19th February) has issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) concerning the anticipatory bail plea of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Amanatullah Khan. This move comes in light of Khan’s involvement in the ongoing investigation into alleged money laundering activities linked to the Delhi Waqf Board. The […]
