Supreme Court to Hear Ten Petitions Challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on April 16

The Supreme Court of India will hear ten petitions, including one by MP Asaduddin Owaisi, challenging the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on April 16. This Act introduces significant changes to the management of waqf properties, increasing Central Government authority and altering the criteria for declaring waqf, raising concerns among communities.

Congress MP Challenges Waqf Amendment Act in Supreme Court, Calls It Discriminatory

NEW DELHI: Today, 4th April: A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court by Congress Member of Parliament (MP) Mohammad Jawed against the Waqf Amendment Act. He argues that the law is unfair to the Muslim community and violates their fundamental rights. Mohammad Jawed, who is also the Congress party whip in the Lok Sabha, was a part of the Joint Parliamentary Committee that reviewed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill of 2024.

‘A Life Was Lost—Yet, All Of You Are Politicizing Tragedy’: Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya Over Fake News On Farmer’s Suicide

The Karnataka High Court quashed an FIR against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya for allegedly spreading fake news about a farmer’s suicide. The court cited Surya’s arguments, stating the controversial tweet was deleted and did not constitute an offense. The hearing on the matter was reserved for December 5 after considering both parties’ arguments.

Budaun Mosque Row|| “Confident That We will Get Court Permission for Worship”: Masjid Committee Cites Places of Worship Act, Claims Waqf Ownership, Next Hearing on Dec 10

Yesterday, On 3rd December, the Budaun Mosque dispute continued as the Masjid Committee argued that the case violates the Places of Worship Act, 1991, amidst claims by the Hindu Mahasabha that the mosque was built over a temple. The court has scheduled further hearings for December 10 to finalize arguments from both sides.

Delhi High Court Rejects Plea for Establishment of Sanatana Dharma Protection Board

The Delhi High Court Today (Nov 27) dismissed a petition seeking establishment of Board for Protection of Sanatana Dharma on the lines of Waqf Board for the protection of Hindu religion. The Bench said that the matter is one which falls within the domain of policy and courts cannot interfere.

“I Have Been President Since 2006”- Waqf Board as Shimla Sanjauli Mosque Dispute Intensifies

The Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board confirmed Latif Mohammad as president of the Sanjauli mosque committee during a district court hearing regarding unauthorised floors of the mosque. Following violent protests, the Municipal Commissioner’s Court authorized demolition, but the All Himachal Muslim Organisation challenged this. The next hearing is scheduled for November 30, highlighting tensions over urban governance and religious rights.

“Unauthorized Madrasa Activities”: Centre Urges HC to Order Karnataka Govt. to Vacate Madrasa from Srirangapatna Masjid

The Central government has requested the Karnataka High Court to order the removal of a madrasa operating within the protected Jama Masjid in Srirangapatna, citing unauthorized activities. The Waqf Board contends that it owns the property and the madrasa activities are lawful. The next hearing is set for November 20, with significant implications for similar cases.

“Waqf Law Itself was a Mistake & Removing it Entirely Would Be Ideal”: Union Minister Pralhad Joshi

Union Minister Pralhad Joshi criticized the Waqf law as a mistake, alleging it burdens farmers with document demands and undermines transparency. He urged a review or repeal of the law, warning against its unchecked authority, which could lead to land seizures. Joshi called for action against officials involved in questionable land record modifications.

“UCC Will Not Infringe Upon the Fundamental Religious Rights Protected Under Article 25”: SC Adv. Ashwini Upadhya

At a Dehradun event, Supreme Court advocate Ashwini Upadhyay assured that the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will not violate religious rights under Article 25. The discussion emphasized the UCC’s role in national uniformity while respecting constitutional freedoms, with input from various legal experts.