Karnataka High Court emphasized the need for a thorough inquiry before altering ownership records concerning private property. In a case involving disputed land, the court ruled in favor of a petitioner whose ownership claim was challenged by the Wakf Board. The court highlighted the burden of proof on the Board and directed a proper legal process for resolving the dispute.
The Hindu side argues in the Krishna Janmbhoomi-Idgah suit that a mosque’s presence does not automatically make the property a Waqf. They assert that the land was originally a temple and challenge the mosque’s claim. The High Court will continue hearings, addressing legal issues and considering evidence regarding the property’s designation and history.