The Supreme Court has raised serious questions over key clauses of the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, highlighting excessive state involvement and stringent procedures that burden individuals seeking to adopt a new faith.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna briefed the Supreme Court’s full bench about a meeting concerning Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s controversial remarks about Muslims. These comments provoked public outcry and calls for impeachment. The Collegium is considering measures, including a possible inquiry and a public apology, to address the situation, emphasizing judicial independence.
Today (10th Dec): The Supreme Court has taken note of remarks made by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court during a December 8 event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s legal cell.
The apex court, on its administrative side, has sought details and particulars from the High Court regarding the matter, which is currently under consideration.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy with remarks suggesting India should align with majority views, referencing the Uniform Civil Code. His speech included derogatory comments about extremists and raised concerns regarding his impartiality. Criticism arose from legal experts about his commitment to constitutional values and judicial independence.
The Calcutta High Court, led by Justice Hiranmoy Bhattacharya, ordered the Police Superintendent to compile a report on incidents of vandalism during Durga Puja, following a plea for an independent investigation. The court emphasized the need for transparency and directed that the report be submitted by November 14.
Alok Kumar, VHP President, criticized the Law Ministry for publicizing a private judges’ meeting. He clarified that only retired judges attended the closed-door event. The gathering focused on various societal issues, including the Waqf Bill and temple-related matters. The public disclosure raised concerns about event confidentiality. Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal’s participation stirred a Twitter debate.