New Delhi, March 11 – The Delhi High Court on Tuesday stated that top wrestlers like Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, and Sakshi Malik could challenge the Centre’s decision to revoke the suspension of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI).
On Thursday(22nd August), Renowned Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat voiced serious concerns about the alleged withdrawal of security for women wrestlers set to testify in the sexual harassment case against former WFI president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. She highlighted the potential risks involved for these witnesses.
The Delhi High Court today restored the mandate of the Indian Olympic Association’s ad-hoc committee for the Wrestling Federation of India, following a plea by wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Satyawart Kadian. The court ruled that the dissolution of the ad-hoc committee was unwarranted and allowed IOA to reconstitute it with multi-member expertise in international federations.
Vidushpat Singhania, representing the Indian Olympic Association, stated that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) provided only a brief rejection of Vinesh Phogat’s appeal for her disqualification. The decision can be appealed to the Swiss Federal Tribunal within 30 days. Vinesh Phogat was disqualified from the Paris Olympics 2024 for exceeding the weight limit by 100 grams. Despite efforts to reduce her weight, she was unable to meet the criteria, leading to her disqualification and subsequent retirement from wrestling. Sarah Ann Hildebrandt won the gold medal in the women’s 50kg freestyle event.
![[Breaking] Paris Olympics 2024| CAS Postpones Verdict on Vinesh Phogat’s Appeal to August 16](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-47-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th August, CAS postpones decision on Vinesh Phogat’s appeal challenging her disqualification from the Paris Olympics until August 16. This is the third delay in the ruling, leaving her fate uncertain. Vinesh seeks a joint-silver medal, contesting her disqualification for being slightly overweight. The outcome could have widespread implications for Indian sports.
![[Paris Olympics 2024] Vinesh Phogat Appeal for Silver Medal; CAS Appointed Dr Annabelle Bennett As Sole Arbitrator To Decide|| Adjudicate on Aug 11](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-39-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Vinesh Phogat has appealed her disqualification from the 2024 Paris Olympics, challenging the United World Wrestling’s decision. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) appointed Dr. Annabelle Bennett as the sole arbitrator. A hearing is scheduled for August 9, with a decision expected before the Olympic Games’ conclusion on August 11.
Today(9th August), Harish Salve, a prominent Indian lawyer, will represent the IOA in the CAS hearing for wrestler Vinesh Phogat’s Paris Olympics disqualification. His extensive legal experience is vital in addressing the complex case. The hearing could potentially impact Phogat’s retirement decision, urging her to reconsider, and has broader implications for Indian wrestling’s global representation.
Today, On 8th August, Wrestlers Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia have filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, challenging the legitimacy of the Wrestling Federation of India’s December elections, alleging interference in Olympic decisions. The court is yet to deliver a verdict despite urgency due to national interest. The WFI’s suspension and subsequent developments have also been outlined.
Vinesh Phogat has appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) to be allowed to compete for gold and has requested a joint silver medal if successful. The interim ruling by CAS is expected on Today(on 8th August), following her disqualification from the Paris 2024 wrestling final for missing the weight requirement by 100 grams.
Today(on 2nd April), The Delhi High Court heard a petition from wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Satyawart Kadian regarding issues with the Wrestling Federation of India. The court directed the Centre and IOA to clarify their stance post-IOA committee dissolution. Justice Sachin Datta stressed the need for clarity and requested IOA’s explanation on the committee dissolution, setting the next hearing for April 10.