Defamation Case | High Court Upholds Medha Patkar’s Conviction in Suit Filed by Delhi LG VK Saxena

Today, On 29th July, In a major development, the Delhi High Court has upheld social activist Medha Patkar’s conviction in the defamation case filed by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena over remarks made during the Narmada Bachao Andolan conflict.

Defamation Case | Medha Patkar Moves Delhi High Court to Challenge Conviction

Today, On 7th April, Social activist Medha Patkar has approached to the Delhi High Court to fight against a defamation case decision. She was earlier found guilty for saying wrong things about someone. Now, she wants the court to cancel that decision. The court will hear her side and decide what to do next.

MCOCA Case Against AAP’s Naresh Balyan || “Prosecution to File Supplementary Chargesheet By Apr 2”: Delhi Court To Police

A Delhi court directed the police to file a chargesheet in the MCOCA case against Naresh Balyan by April 2. Special Judge Kaveri Baweja granted 20 days of custody to the police. The order came after a plea by special public prosecutor Akhand Pratap Singh on March 12. The case remains under active investigation.

Hardeep Singh Nijjar Murder | Canada Supreme Court Grants Bail To Four Indians Accused

The Canadian Supreme Court has granted bail to four individuals accused in the Hardeep Singh Nijjar murder case. The court has also issued orders for their release. This decision comes after the four were arrested in connection with the high-profile murder of Nijjar, a prominent Sikh leader. The case has drawn international attention and sparked legal proceedings in Canada.

[Breaking] Delhi Pollution: “Why Workers Not Received Full Compensation, After Court Clear Directives”: SC Slams Chief Secretary Dharmendra

The Supreme Court On Thursday (5th Dec) criticized Delhi Chief Secretary Dharmendra for failing to ensure full compensation for construction workers amid air quality measures. Justices questioned delays in payments despite previous directives and demanded immediate resolution. The government was directed to inform unregistered workers about their rights and enhance registration efforts in the ongoing pollution crisis response.

“Appellant’s Counsel Displayed Nudity & Certain Gestures”: Kerala Lawyer Faces FIR for Making Sexual Gestures During Virtual Court Hearing

An FIR filed against Kerala lawyer TK Ajan for indecent behavior during a virtual court appearance. He allegedly exposed himself and made obscene gestures, leading to the termination of the video conference session by the court. The charges include offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Kerala Police Act. This incident highlights challenges posed by virtual court hearings in maintaining courtroom decorum.

[Excise Policy Case] “Kejriwal Promised Rs 90 Lakh to Each of 40 Goa Candidates, Funds Came from South Group”, CBI Tells Court: Judicial Custody Extended Till Sept 3

Special Judge Kaveri Baweja today extended Arvind Kejriwal’s judicial custody till September 3, following CBI’s revelation that he promised Rs 90 lakhs to 40 Goa election candidates, with funding from the South Group. The court is considering a supplementary charge sheet. Kejriwal remains in Tihar jail, with his bail plea deferred by the Supreme Court until September 5.

“Will Review a Supplementary Chargesheet Filed By The CBI Against Delhi CM”: Court Extends Arvind Kejriwal’s Judicial Custody Until August 27

Today, On 20th July, Arvind Kejriwal’s custody extended until August 27 in a corruption case related to an alleged excise scam. Delhi High Court upholds arrest as “legal,” stating evidence and witness influence concerns. Supreme Court issues notice to CBI in bail petition, denying interim bail request on health grounds. Kejriwal’s arrest by CBI labeled as “insurance arrest.”

Shahi Idgah Row: Hindu Side in High Court Argues ‘1968 Compromise’ as a Fraud

Today, On 15th May, The Shahi Idgah dispute took on a new dimension as Hindu parties accused the Sunni Waqf Board of fraudulent representation in a 1968 compromise. They contested the ownership of the disputed land and raised questions about the mosque committee’s authority. The case’s outcome could have far-reaching implications for religious site management and communal harmony.