The Madras High Court observed that the trial court “committed a grave error without understanding the fundamental principle of criminal law” while convicting the appellant. The Court set aside the conviction and directed the trial judge to undergo judicial training.
Allahabad High Court rules that injury to private parts is not necessary to prove rape or gang-rape. Victim testimony alone can establish the offence under Indian law.
The Supreme Court has ruled that in cases under Section 376 IPC, a rape victim’s credible and trustworthy testimony will prevail over the absence or insufficiency of medical evidence, provided her story is found to be creditworthy.
After the rape of a 70-year-old tourist in Pahalgam, the court criticised the declining moral values in Kashmir, stating, “Mere meadows, mountains, rivers will not rescue Kashmir” as a desirable tourist destination anymore.
The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court acquitted two boys of stalking a minor girl, stating that a single instance of following does not constitute stalking under the IPC and POCSO Act. However, one boy was upheld on charges of sexual assault based on credible evidence, while the other faced reduced sentencing.
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition by Madhab Chandra Pradhan and others challenging the denial to recall a minor victim for re-examination in a POCSO case. This decision upholds the protection of child victims in sexual offense cases.
