A Rajasthan court acquitted Jitendra Singh Gulia, a former judge, of charges stemming from a mother’s complaint that he sexually abused her 14-year-old son at a tennis club in 2021. Despite allegations of drugging and intimidation, evidence presented by the defense led the judge to rule the claims unsubstantiated.
Today, On 16th December, The Jaunpur Court is poised to deliver a verdict today on the Swaraj Vahini Association’s petition for an Amin survey of the Atala Mosque. The case’s significance is heightened by a recent Supreme Court ruling that restricts courts from ordering surveys of disputed sites, raising concerns over historical ownership and legal precedents.
A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court Today (Oct 4) rejected review petitions against its judgment which held that royalty paid by mining operators to the Central government is not a tax and that states have the power to levy cesses on mining and mineral-use activities. Justice Nagarathna dissented from the majority and issued notice on the review petitions.
Today, On 26th September, the Supreme Court rejected the Gujarat government’s plea to review its prior decision on the Bilkis Bano case, which involved the early release of 11 convicts in a 2002 gangrape and murder. The court upheld its remarks on the state’s actions, reaffirming systemic issues related to the Gujarat riots.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 18) adjourned to October 16 the hearing on a question whether its 2022 verdict upholding the Enforcement Directorate’s powers to arrest and attach property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act required any reconsideration. Earlier in the day, a three-judge bench headed by Justice Surya Kant had deferred the matter to October 3 after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate (ED), mentioned the matter seeking an adjournment.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 18) deferred to October 3 the hearing on a question whether its 2022 verdict upholding the Enforcement Directorate’s powers to arrest and attach property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act required any reconsideration.
Today, On 2nd May, In the Supreme Court, a significant case concerning the promotion of judicial officers has emerged, sparking widespread interest, the appointment of senior civil judges as additional district and sessions judges and the interpretation of Rule 5(1)(1). Suspension of promotions and calls for a Constitution bench highlight the case’s significance. The court also seeks clarification on promotion criteria, emphasizing the importance of interpreting rules.
Former Calcutta High Court judge Abhijit Gangopadhyay Today (April 22nd) called the court’s decision to cancel all SLST recruitment appointments in West Bengal’s government-sponsored schools an “appropriate judgment.” He further demanded the immediate resignation of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in response to the order on April 22nd.
Today (5th April): The Rouse Avenue Court has allowed the CBI to interrogate BRS leader K Kavitha in Tihar Jail regarding the Delhi excise policy case. Kavitha was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate for alleged money laundering. The interrogation seeks information about recovered chats and a land deal related to bribery allegations. Kavitha is currently in judicial custody, with a verdict on her interim bail plea expected on April 8.
Delhi High Court to decide on Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against his arrest in a money laundering case related to the Delhi Excise Policy scam at 4:30 PM today. Kejriwal’s legal counsel argued against the arrest’s necessity and emphasized political implications. The court will issue notices and hear arguments on his interim release. The decision is set for 4:30 PM.
