“What Have You Done in Nine Months Since Taking Over?” SC After Uttarakhand Cancels 14 Patanjali Licences

Today (30th April): The Supreme Court rebuked the Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for inaction in a case involving misleading advertisements by Patanjali Ayurveda. The court criticized Patanjali for non-compliance with its orders but appreciated the improvement in their actions after issuing a public apology. The court highlighted the need for caution and responsible advertising practices.

IMA vs. UOI | Supreme Court Levies Rs.10,000 Fine on Intervention Applicant for Alleged Proxy Litigation in ‘Patanjali Case’

The Supreme Court fined an intervention applicant Rs.10,000 for attempting to join a case against Patanjali Ayurved with misleading claims. The applicant alleged a quack doctor’s role in their mother’s death, but the court dismissed the application, warning against manipulating the legal process. Patanjali faced criticism for misleading advertisements and offered an unconditional apology.