The Supreme Court on Monday (16th Dec) has requested the Uttar Pradesh government’s response regarding a bail plea from former minister Azam Khan and his son, Abdullah, in connection with a 2022 case alleging the theft of a road-cleaning machine. The Allahabad High Court previously denied their bail. The Khans claim political motivation behind the charges.
Stakeholders express concerns about the future of Kamil and Fazil students in Uttar Pradesh as the government considers amending the Madrasa Act, following a Supreme Court ruling. Proposed changes may exclude these courses from official recognition, impacting approximately 38,000 students. Clarity and safeguards are urged to protect student interests amidst these developments.
The Allahabad High Court ordered the listing of a writ petition seeking the registration of an FIR against officials involved in the Sambhal violence case. The petition was filed by the Hazrat Khwajah Garib Nawaj Welfare Association, claiming officials were responsible for the incident that resulted in four deaths.
The Supreme Court, while hearing a plea against the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act, described it as “draconian.” Justices Gavai and Viswanathan admitted the appeal and pointed out the need for further consideration. Concerns were raised about civil liberties and misuse of the Act, which targets organized crime in Uttar Pradesh.
![[Remo D'Souza Cheating Case] "No Serious Prejudice to Prosecution": SC Transfers Matter to Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-14.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 22nd November, The Supreme Court has transferred a cheating case against choreographer Remo D’Souza to a Delhi court to ensure a fair trial. The case revolves around allegations of financial fraud involving an investment in D’Souza’s film, with claims of threats from an underworld figure when the money was not returned.
![[Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath Disputes] SC to Decide on Transfer Case to Allahabad HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-63.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court is reviewing a plea to transfer the Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath dispute cases to the Allahabad High Court. This follows a January ruling allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi Mosque’s cellar. Legal debates center on historical claims, the influence of the Places of Worship Act, and concerns of conflicting judgments in ongoing cases.
Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court requested a response from the Uttar Pradesh government regarding a petition by choreographer Remo D’Souza, who seeks to quash a 2016 cheating case against him. The case, linked to a failed investment promise, highlights critical legal issues that may impact future entertainment industry regulations.
On his last day as Chief Justice, DY Chandrachud provided relief to parents seeking euthanasia for their son, Harish Rana, who has been in a vegetative state for over 13 years. The Uttar Pradesh government agreed to cover medical expenses, leading the family to withdraw their euthanasia request and accept a care plan instead.
Today, On 24th October, the Supreme Court provided interim protection to journalist Mamta Tripathi, who faced multiple FIRs for tweeting about caste bias in Uttar Pradesh’s administration. The Court has requested the state government’s response to her plea for quashing the FIRs, emphasizing journalists’ rights under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
![[Bahraich Violence] "Is State Misunderstood Intent of Previous Order on Demolition Notices?": Allahabad HC Slams UP Govt. For not Filing Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-6.png?resize=447%2C251&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd October, the Allahabad High Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for not responding to a case regarding demolitions in Bahraich. The court expressed frustration over delays and instructed the state to provide detailed information about the road’s category. Affected residents were given 15 days to respond to demolition notices.