Today, On 22nd April, The Supreme Court ordered the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) to assess the impact of nearby glass industries on the Taj Mahal. This comes as concerns grow about pollution affecting the iconic monument in Uttar Pradesh.
Today, On 6th January, The Supreme Court will hear pleas on March 25 against the acquittal of Surendra Koli in the Nithari killings case. Koli, who was earlier convicted and sentenced for several murders and horrific crimes, was cleared in some cases after appeals. The case has gathered much attention due to the shocking nature of the crimes. The hearing will decide the future of the acquittal decisions.
The Bar Council of India (BCI) approached the Supreme Court for permission to increase enrolment fees, saying it is facing a financial crisis. In July 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that State Bar Councils and the BCI cannot charge fees above the limit set by the Advocates Act. The BCI claims that the current fee limit is making it difficult for them to work properly. They have requested higher fees to improve their financial situation.
The Allahabad High Court instructed the Uttar Pradesh government to address the relocation request of the Hathras rape victim’s family for their safety. The court emphasized the urgency following delays since February 2024 and required a prompt response from the District Magistrate, with compliance to be assessed by January 2025.
![[Illegal Tree Felling] "454 Trees Illegally Felled in Violation of Court Orders": SC Issued Contempt Notice to UP Officials](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Image-7.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th November, the Supreme Court issued contempt notices to Uttar Pradesh officials for illegally felling 454 trees on Vrindavan Road. The Court mandated that permitted tree-felling must occur only between 6 PM and 8 AM. A halt to further tree felling was ordered, highlighting the need for adherence to judicial directives.
Today, On 13th September, The Supreme Court called for data on lawyers’ strikes in Uttar Pradesh, focusing on Faizabad. Concerned about the impact on judicial proceedings, the Court intends to broaden the case’s scope beyond Faizabad. It emphasized advocates’ responsibility as officers of the court. The next hearing is on September 23, with expected interim orders.
The Supreme Court of India appointed eight retired High Court judges as Senior Advocates, emphasizing their notable legal careers and contributions to the judiciary. The decision, made during a full court meeting, reflects the Court’s commitment to recognizing exemplary service. Additionally, 39 lawyers, including 10 women, were also designated as Senior Advocates on the same day.
In a recent development, Advocate Vishal Tiwari, who filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court, has countered the Uttar Pradesh State’s status report on police encounter killings. Tiwari expressed concerns, stating, “Encounter killings are often celebrated as achievements by state police officials, further encouraging arbitrary and unconstitutional actions.” He pointed out that […]
