The Bombay High Court ruled that mere association with Dawood Ibrahim does not automatically constitute membership in a terrorist gang under the UAPA. The court clarified the distinction between individual activities and those of a terrorist gang, granting bail to the accused due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged offenses.
Today, On 18th July, The Supreme Court ruled that slow trial progress cannot be used to deny bail under the UAPA, despite a previous judgment. The Watali ruling should not be a blanket precedent for denial of bail to undertrial prisoners facing prolonged incarceration without foreseeable trial completion. The Court emphasized the right to a speedy trial and granted bail to a man accused under the UAPA, highlighting that statutory restrictions should not impede the granting of bail.
![[2016 Terror Funding Case] Court Rejects Baramulla MP Rashid's Interim Bail Plea to Take Oath as Parliament Member](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-24-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 18th June, Engineer Rashid’s request for interim bail denied, and he will remain in Tihar Jail despite winning the Baramulla Lok Sabha seat. The rejection means he cannot take his MP oath. He has been detained since 2019 over alleged terror funding. His arrest and legal battles have marked his political journey, raising concerns about terrorism’s influence in regional politics.
Today, On 7th May, The Kerala High Court refused to be a battleground for political conflicts, emphasizing fair investigation without political interference. The PIL raised concerns over the Kodakara black money heist, involving BJP’s K Surendran. The court stressed on non-politicization of legal proceedings, endorsed law enforcement’s proactive role, and highlighted the thorough investigative process. The next hearing is scheduled for May 10.
Today, 6th May, The Delhi High Court ordered the release of Amit Chakraborty, HR Head of NewsClick, in a UAPA case, following his decision to become an approver. The case involves allegations of receiving funds from China. This ruling reflects the complexity and controversy of UAPA-related cases in India, impacting press freedom and anti-terror laws.
Supreme Court Justice Gavai questioned the Delhi High Court’s reasoning in bail and remand orders during a hearing on April 30. The discussion pertained to the arrest and remand of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha by the Delhi Police under the UAPA. Justice Gavai highlighted the need to adhere to the Pankaj Bansal ruling, emphasizing the requirement to inform the accused about the grounds of their arrest. The Court reserved its judgment in Purkayastha’s case for a later date.
On Thursday( 25th April), Pragya Singh Thakur, accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, finally appeared in court after previous non-appearances, citing illness. Despite claiming illness, she submitted her statement in court and sought permission for a thumb impression due to palm weakness. The court granted her request. The trial, overseen by the NIA, is progressing with thorough examinations and statements.
At Delhi High Court, the city police firmly opposed the bail plea of student activist Sharjeel Imam in connection with the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) case. At Delhi High Court, the city police on Tuesday firmly opposed the bail plea of student activist Sharjeel Imam in connection with the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) […]
Today, the Delhi High Court addressed Sharjeel Imam’s bail plea in a case involving charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and sedition over his inflammatory speeches. The court has sought a response from the Delhi Police within two weeks and scheduled another hearing for April. Imam’s speeches at Aligarh Muslim University and in Delhi were perceived to instigate opposition to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Despite arguing that he should be granted statutory bail, the trial court refused Imam’s plea, emphasizing the disruptive impact of his speeches on the 2020 riots in the national capital. He faces severe charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the UAPA. The statutory bail in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) allows for a maximum detention of 90 days, which can be extended to 180 days in terror-related cases under the UAPA. If the investigation is not complete at the end of this period, the court can release the person on default bail.
![[BREAKING] Delhi Riots 2020 Conspiracy Case: Delhi High Court Seeks Police Reply to Umar Khalid's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/1666016562_1619124028_khalid.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Umar Khalid, the former JNU student leader, has filed for bail in the Delhi riots case, making his second attempt for release. Facing charges under UAPA and IPC for his alleged role in orchestrating the 2020 riots, he awaits the Delhi Police’s response as the trial court sets the next hearing for March 11, 2024.