The Delhi High Court tribunal upheld the five-year extension of the ban on Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), citing its continued subversive activities. The group, founded by Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, issued threats to top Indian officials and attempted to incite violence. Authorities highlighted SFJ’s use of social media to spread separatist propaganda. The extension aims to stop its influence and maintain national security.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna stated that high courts are capable of handling UAPA challenges initially. He emphasized that the Supreme Court should not be the first forum for such cases. The bench advised petitioners to approach the respective high courts before seeking intervention from the apex court. This decision reinforces the legal process and judicial hierarchy in handling UAPA cases.
Today, On 14th January, The Delhi High Court heard Tahir Hussain’s plea seeking interim bail to contest the upcoming assembly elections. The police opposed the plea, arguing that the right to contest elections is not a fundamental right. Hussain is accused of being the mastermind and funder of the Delhi riots. The High Court has reserved its decision on the matter.
![[Terror Funding Case] NIA Seeks High Court’s Nod to Transfer MP/MLA Court Jurisdiction to Special NIA Court for Engineer Rashid’s Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-33-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi Court is set to announce its decision on Engineer Rashid’s regular bail plea on November 20, following delays in ruling on his bail related to a terror-funding case. Rashid has been in Tihar jail since 2019, and the judge’s decision will also consider the case’s jurisdiction and possible transfer.
![[Delhi Riots Case] HC Issues Notice to Delhi Police After Devangana Kalita Moves Against Case Diary 'Tampering'](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Delhi-Court-Denies-Bail-to-Pinjra-Tod-Leader-Devangana-Kalita.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Devangana Kalita has petitioned the Delhi High Court for the preservation and reconstruction of her case diary, alleging police tampering with evidence in the 2020 Delhi riots case. The High Court has instructed the Delhi Police to submit a status report, with the next hearing set for November 25. Kalita was previously released on bail after multiple arrests related to the riots.
The Patiala House Court today granted interim bail to Abdul Rashid, also known as Engineer Rashid, allowing him to participate in the Jammu and Kashmir assembly elections. However, the court postponed the decision on his regular bail application and imposed restrictions on speaking to the media about the ongoing terror funding case. The bail extends until October 2. Celebrations ensued in Jammu and Kashmir but rival political parties expressed discontent, citing concerns about Rashid’s potential influence as a Member of Parliament. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) opposed his regular bail, alleging that he could influence witnesses and had previously defended terrorist acts. His lawyer argued that the interim bail was crucial for campaign purposes. Rashid, who won the Baramulla seat in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, is seeking bail as his case unfolds. In 2005, he was arrested for alleged support of militants, and in 2019, he was detained under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
Advocate Balraj Singh Malik, representing one of the accused in the Parliament security breach case, argued before a Delhi court on Monday that the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) should not be applied to young individuals who express frustration with the government’s authoritarian behavior. NEW DELHI: On Monday(9th Sept), the Patiala House Court reserved its […]
Today, On 6th September, Student activist Meeran Haider withdrew his bail plea in connection with a UAPA case related to the 2020 Delhi riots, opting to approach the trial court instead. Accused of conspiracy, Haider faces charges under UAPA and the IPC for the northeast Delhi riots. His legal battle is closely watched as it may set a precedent for similar cases.
Today, On 13th July, The Supreme Court sought responses from four states on the transfer of Sharjeel Imam’s trials to Delhi. Imam, facing charges of sedition and promoting enmity, seeks consolidation of FIRs from multiple states. The Court aims to centralize the cases for a fair and efficient trial process, considering the states’ input.
![[BREAKING] Bhima Koregaon Row: Bombay High Court Denied Default Bail Plea of Five Accused](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-7-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Bombay High Court denied default bail to the five accused in the Bhima Koregaon violence case. The accused, arrested under the UAPA in 2018, had appealed against the special court’s orders. The case stems from violent clashes during the bicentenary celebrations, leading to arrests of activists with alleged “Maoist links.” Subsequent events include arrests, bail grants, and legal proceedings.