The UPSC opposed pre-arrest bail for Puja Khedkar, calling the fraud’s severity unprecedented. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court, it stressed the need for custodial interrogation. Authorities aim to uncover the full extent of her alleged fraudulent activities. The case has drawn significant legal and public attention.
Today, On 15th January, The Supreme Court granted interim protection from arrest to former IAS trainee Puja Khedkar. She is accused of fraudulently using reservation benefits meant for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Persons with Benchmark Disabilities to pass the UPSC exam. Khedkar has denied the charges, and the court’s order allows her temporary relief. The case is under further investigation.
Today, On 19th September, the Delhi High Court issued a notice to Puja Khedkar regarding a perjury case linked to the UPSC. The allegations include submitting false documents and misleading affidavits to manipulate court decisions. The next hearing is scheduled for September 26, coinciding with Khedkar’s anticipatory bail plea.
Today, On 5th September, Former IAS probationer Puja Khedkar has offered to undergo a medical examination at AIIMS following claims that her disability certificates may be forged. The Delhi Police alleges that she misrepresented information to secure reservation benefits for the civil services examination and has questioned her eligibility. Khedkar has denied all allegations, with further hearings scheduled for September 26.
Puja Khedkar contested the UPSC’s decision to disqualify her, arguing that once appointed as a probationer, the commission lacked the authority to revoke her candidature. The UPSC accused her of fraudulent practices, leading to legal proceedings including a criminal case and suspension of her probation period. Khedkar denies the allegations and challenges the UPSC’s actions in court.
Today, On 21st August, The Delhi High Court extended the interim protection for suspended trainee IAS officer Pooja Khedkar until August 29. Khedkar is accused of falsifying information in her application to the UPSC. The court instructed the investigation agency not to arrest her, while the case is under review. The Delhi Police have opposed the anticipatory bail, expressing concerns about potential interference with the investigation.
Today, On 9th July, The Supreme Court criticized the government for not implementing the Disability Act and addressing vacancies for disabled individuals. It mandated the appointment of a visually impaired candidate who passed the Civil Services Examination in 2009, and directed the consideration of 10 other visually impaired candidates for appointment to backlog vacancies. Appointments should be made within three months.