Today, On 23rd July, The Supreme Court praised Nagaland for holding local body elections with a 33% women’s quota and closed the contempt case against the state government. Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan commended the participation and success of women candidates. The Court had previously mandated the reservation of one-third of the seats for women in these elections.
A PIL filed in Allahabad High Court challenges the Central Government’s notification declaring June 25 as ‘Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas,’ alleging lack of proper authority and offensive language against the Constitution. The advocate contends that the notification violates constitutional provisions and aims to appease political superiors, emphasizing that the Constitution is inherently resilient.
The Jharkhand High Court recommended the implementation of insurance benefits for lawyers to provide financial security and support. This decision is based on a Public Interest Litigation highlighting the financial difficulties faced by lawyers, emphasizing the need to safeguard their welfare. Both State and Central governments are urged to take action to protect the lives of lawyers.
The Delhi High Court upheld a law mandating 50% coverage of health warnings on pan masala packaging to inform consumers about its harmful effects. The ruling aimed to promote public health and increase consumer awareness. The Court dismissed a plea by a pan masala company, emphasizing the regulation’s proportionate nature and its alignment with public interest.
Today, On 9th July, The Supreme Court criticized the government for not implementing the Disability Act and addressing vacancies for disabled individuals. It mandated the appointment of a visually impaired candidate who passed the Civil Services Examination in 2009, and directed the consideration of 10 other visually impaired candidates for appointment to backlog vacancies. Appointments should be made within three months.
A plea filed in the Allahabad High Court seeks a health insurance policy for lawyers, citing their significant health risks and financial burdens. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlights the lack of medical insurance coverage for legal professionals and urges the court to order the implementation of a comprehensive health insurance policy.
The Delhi High Court raised serious concerns about deforestation, warning that continued apathy could turn the city into a barren desert. With temperatures reaching an unprecedented 52.3 degrees Celsius, the urgency for effective measures to combat deforestation and preserve green spaces is emphasized. The Court also mandated the formation of a Special Empowered Committee for forest conservation.
Today, On 30th May, Delhi High Court directed Meta to reinstate Harper’s Bazaar India’s Instagram account, suspended due to three copyright strikes by Backgrid USA. The decision stresses the need for due process in such suspensions. Both parties have reached a consensus. This underscores the significance of amicable resolutions in copyright disputes involving vital online platforms.
The Supreme Court of India set to hear a petition challenging the mandatory requirement for lawyers to wear black coats, citing unsuitability for the hot climate. The petitioner calls for alternative dress code options to accommodate diverse climatic conditions. The petition seeks exemptions during summer months and a committee to study the health impacts.
Yesterday,22nd April, During a court hearing in Delhi, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) faced questions about recording doctor statements for a money laundering case. This pertains to the ongoing ‘Land-for-Jobs’ scam investigation. The ED’s response will clarify legal protocols for obtaining statements from medical professionals in financial crime cases. The court will continue discussions on Amit Katyal’s bail and the scrutiny of his medical condition.