A PIL petition filed today in the Madras High Court challenges the Hindi and Sanskrit names given to three new laws replacing the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Indian Evidence Act. The petitioner argues that naming these critical laws in Hindi and Sanskrit could pose challenges for non-Hindi speakers and infringement upon the rights of legal professionals.
Today, On 26th June, President Droupadi Murmu emphasized prioritizing justice over punishment with the introduction of new criminal laws, aiming to expedite judicial proceedings. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 will replace outdated British-era laws, aligning with Indian values and emphasizing comprehensive justice for all.
![[Post-Poll Violence] "No Reservation if Central Forces Stay in Bengal Extended": Home Ministry to Cal HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-58.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 25th April, The Delhi High Court issued a notice to the CBI in response to a plea challenging the trial court’s decision on the Excise Policy case. The case involves incomplete investigations and potential implications for excise policies. The court sought a response from the CBI and fixed the matter for May 3, 2024, indicating a critical phase in the legal process.
Debabrata Saikia, Leader of Opposition in Assam, has filed an Interlocutory Application before the Supreme Court On 13th March, challenging the regulations and Citizenship Amendment Act. Saikia argues that the act’s classification based on religion and country of origin violates constitutional principles and the Assam Accord. He requests a halt to the act’s implementation, citing potential harm and constitutionality violations.