The Centre informed the Allahabad High Court that a plea regarding Rahul Gandhi’s alleged dual citizenship is “under process” and expected to be resolved by December 19. A petition has been filed asking for a CBI investigation into Gandhi’s citizenship status, questioning his eligibility for public office amid claims of British citizenship.
The Delhi High Court rejected a petition seeking the disclosure of information about deceased policyholders under the PMJJBY scheme to aid LIC in claim processing. The court emphasized data privacy and procedural integrity, warning that the proposed approach could facilitate scams by allowing unauthorized claims, highlighting the importance of protecting policyholders’ rights.
The Supreme Court of India Today (Oct 17) is considering several petitions that seek to criminalize marital rape, which is currently exempt from prosecution under Indian law if it occurs between spouses. The case is being heard by a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. Senior Advocate Karuna Nundy appeared before the court, representing civil appeals. During the proceedings, the CJI asked Nundy, “Are you appearing before us in the appeal against the Delhi High Court verdict?” Nundy confirmed, “Yes, I am appearing.” The CJI noted, “It is a constitutional question. There are two judgments before us, and we need to make a decision.”
President’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir has been lifted, allowing Omar Abdullah’s National Conference-Congress coalition to form a government. The Union Home Ministry issued a notification revoking the rule, initially imposed in 2019. Abdullah’s key agenda includes seeking the restoration of statehood following their recent electoral victory.
Today, On 3rd October, the Centre argued against decriminalizing marital rape, asserting that existing laws protect married women’s consent. The Union Home Ministry emphasized that marital violations differ from other cases and suggested that criminalization is a societal issue requiring broader consultation. Current laws already address consent violations within marriage, the Centre stated.
The Supreme Court, led by Justice Abhay Oka, plans to review the e-prisons portal’s functionality on October 3, addressing its practical value for bail processes. The court emphasized the need to understand the data it provides to expedite bail formalities and ensure individuals are promptly produced before the trial court. Further discussions are scheduled for November 5.
Today, On 12th July, The Supreme Court declined to hear Ritwik Dutta’s appeal against the Delhi High Court’s decision on his income tax assessment, citing ongoing proceedings. The I-T department alleges that funds from EarthJustice USA were used for unauthorized activities. Additionally, the CBI has registered an FIR against Dutta for alleged FCRA violations.
A PIL filed in Allahabad High Court challenges the Central Government’s notification declaring June 25 as ‘Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas,’ alleging lack of proper authority and offensive language against the Constitution. The advocate contends that the notification violates constitutional provisions and aims to appease political superiors, emphasizing that the Constitution is inherently resilient.
On July 15, the Union Home Ministry agreed to suspend provisions in newly passed criminal laws requiring evidence to be recorded via video conferencing from police stations, following protests from Delhi’s bar associations. The legal community in Delhi plans to submit a representation to the government, expressing concerns about all three criminal laws enacted this year.
Today, On 9th July, Satyendar Jain’s final bail plea denied by a Delhi court in a money laundering case. The Enforcement Directorate arrested Jain in May 2022 following a CBI FIR from 2017. The former Delhi Cabinet minister’s requests for interim bail rejected, and there are allegations of bribery related to the installation of CCTVs in the city.
