![[Justice Shekhar Yadav's 'Majority' Remark] "I'm Not Apologetic": VHP Chief Alok Kumar](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-5-7.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 10th December, VHP Chief Alok Kumar defended Allahabad High Court Justice Shekhar Yadav’s controversial remarks supporting majoritarianism and the Uniform Civil Code during a VHP event. Amid criticism, Kumar asserted that the justice’s views reflect democratic principles, emphasizing respect for majority sentiments while reiterating the need for awareness sessions despite potential judicial implications.
Today (10th Dec): The Supreme Court has taken note of remarks made by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court during a December 8 event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s legal cell.
The apex court, on its administrative side, has sought details and particulars from the High Court regarding the matter, which is currently under consideration.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy with remarks suggesting India should align with majority views, referencing the Uniform Civil Code. His speech included derogatory comments about extremists and raised concerns regarding his impartiality. Criticism arose from legal experts about his commitment to constitutional values and judicial independence.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court caused a stir by attending a Vishva Hindu Parishad event and making divisive remarks about governance, minority rights, and cultural values. His comments raised concerns about judicial impartiality, particularly regarding the rights of minorities in a democracy, leading to widespread criticism from political leaders.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will hear Dr. K.A. Paul’s petition regarding the Tirupati laddu controversy on November 22. The case involves allegations of adulteration in the sacred prasadam, causing distress among Hindus. An independent Special Investigation Team has been ordered to ensure a thorough inquiry into the claims of compromised quality.
President Droupadi Murmu has approved the formation of the 23rd Law Commission of India, with a three-year term to review and recommend legal reforms. The commission’s objectives include reviewing/repealing obsolete laws, focusing on poverty laws, judicial administration, gender equality, and more. The commission aims to submit reports in Hindi and English and develop partnerships with law universities and policy research institutions.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) opposes a Uniform Civil Code, citing conflict with Sharia law protected by the Shariat Application Act of 1937 and the Indian Constitution. They condemn Prime Minister Modi’s advocacy for a Secular Civil Code, arguing it undermines religious freedom and cultural traditions, potentially marginalizing minority communities.
Justice Anil Verma of the Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized the necessity of a Uniform Civil Code, noting the delayed realization of triple talaq’s unconstitutionality. He made this observation while partly allowing a petition involving charges under the IPC, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights of Marriage) Act 2019, and the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961.
On Sunday(14th July),The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) plans to challenge the Supreme Court’s ruling on maintenance for divorced women after the Iddat period and the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Uttarakhand. During their working committee meeting, they approved eight resolutions addressing these issues.